2013
DOI: 10.1002/cne.23238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D model of frequency representation in the cochlear nucleus of the CBA/J mouse

Abstract: The relationship between structure and function is an invaluable context with which to explore biological mechanisms of normal and dysfunctional hearing. The systematic and topographic representation of frequency originates at the cochlea, and is retained throughout much of the central auditory system. The cochlear nucleus (CN), which initiates all ascending auditory pathways, represents an essential link for understanding frequency organization. A model of the CN that maps frequency representation in 3D would… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
71
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
12
71
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lateral stimulation positions in CN caused more activation in IC electrodes located dorsally (high electrode numbers), whereas medial CN stimulation positions caused more activation in IC recordings located ventrally (low electrode numbers). This pattern follows the mapping of low to high characteristic frequencies in CN (Muniak et al, 2013; Spirou et al, 1993) and in the IC (Richter et al, 2011; Ryan et al, 1982; Snyder et al, 2004). Some of the response patterns to electric stimulation were broader than those for acoustic stimulation (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lateral stimulation positions in CN caused more activation in IC electrodes located dorsally (high electrode numbers), whereas medial CN stimulation positions caused more activation in IC recordings located ventrally (low electrode numbers). This pattern follows the mapping of low to high characteristic frequencies in CN (Muniak et al, 2013; Spirou et al, 1993) and in the IC (Richter et al, 2011; Ryan et al, 1982; Snyder et al, 2004). Some of the response patterns to electric stimulation were broader than those for acoustic stimulation (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Locations at ventrolateral positions of the DCN receive input from auditory nerve fibers of low characteristic frequencies and more dorsomedial sites receive input from higher characteristic frequencies (Fig. 3C, arrow; Muniak et al, 2013; Spirou et al, 1993). This innervation predicts that lateral stimulation locations would activate IC electrodes with high numbers, whereas medial locations would activate electrodes with low numbers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CF-to-position mapping of MOC neurons described in the present study is one of many such tonotopic mappings in the auditory pathway (Clopton et al 1974;Ryan et al 1982;Friauf 1992;Muniak et al 2013). Present results suggest that the MOC mapping is similar to the auditorynerve fiber mapping, either indistinguishable from it (for MOC Ipsi units) or just apical to it (for MOC Contra units, although these data are more limited).…”
Section: Tuning Curves and Morphology Of Labeled Axonssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…In old mice, ABR thresholds were found to be higher than 90 dB SPL, except for 12 and 16 kHz, which are generated in the middle turn of the cochlea (Muniak et al 2013). We analyzed the correlations between SGN density and ABR wave I responses, and the results revealed a positive correlation between SGN density and ABR wave I amplitude (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%