2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-018-2303-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D Markerless asymmetry analysis in the management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Abstract: BackgroundThree dimensional (3D) markerless asymmetry analysis was developed to assess and monitor the scoliotic curve. While the developed surface topography (ST) indices demonstrated a strong correlation with the Cobb angle and its change over time, it was reported that the method requires an expert for monitoring the procedure to prevent misclassification for some patients. Therefore, this study aimed at improving the user-independence level of the previously developed 3D markerless asymmetry analysis imple… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies using 3D ST have often been used to find a measurement method that produces results parallel to the Cobb angle measured by conventional radiography [37,[42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52]. Typically, the results of this approach are less than moderately accurate due to the different measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies using 3D ST have often been used to find a measurement method that produces results parallel to the Cobb angle measured by conventional radiography [37,[42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52]. Typically, the results of this approach are less than moderately accurate due to the different measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiographic measurements of SVA, PT, LL, SS, or PI are based on radiographic points assessed on the full spine radiograms [72], which are inaccessible in surface measurements. Parameters extracted by means of recently developed non-invasive optical systems (including moiré projection method and surface topography) are frequently novel and specific for each device [12,14,47,82,88,99,101,102,103]. Some of the indexes are recommended by the SOSORT [60].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 In a later study by the same team, the accuracy of the classification tree was improved after adding more training data (n = 128) and improving the algorithm for finding the best plane of symmetry. 54,55 Other machine learning methods were examined, and the K-nearest neighborhood and neural network were found to be the most effective methods for predicting the curve severity. 56 Frerich et al 41 used DIERS Formetric 4D system and defined ST parameters, including the scoliosis angle that was correlated to the Cobb angle in the lumbar (r = 0.76, prediction deviation = 9.42°) and thoracic (r = 0.87, prediction deviation = 6.98°) regions.…”
Section: Cobb Angle Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%