2011 IEEE International Vacuum Electronics Conference (IVEC) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/ivec.2011.5747066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D Magnetron simulation with CST STUDIO SUITE™

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The avalanche effect is then reached when the model predicts an exponential increase of the number of electrons being captured in the RF field and the corresponding RF power level is then used as Multipactor power threshold for this component. The corner stone of the Particles In Cell Multipactor RF power threshold prediction accuracy lies in the characterization of the secondary electrons emission created by the incident electron impact with respect to the local surface for each used materials and surface roughness [7][8] [9]. Unfortunately, the characterization of the secondary emission curve of a material sample is quite difficult and not very accurate today, which impairs the ability of the Particles In Cell model to accurately predict the Multipactor power threshold of a component [10] [11].…”
Section: Multipactor Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The avalanche effect is then reached when the model predicts an exponential increase of the number of electrons being captured in the RF field and the corresponding RF power level is then used as Multipactor power threshold for this component. The corner stone of the Particles In Cell Multipactor RF power threshold prediction accuracy lies in the characterization of the secondary electrons emission created by the incident electron impact with respect to the local surface for each used materials and surface roughness [7][8] [9]. Unfortunately, the characterization of the secondary emission curve of a material sample is quite difficult and not very accurate today, which impairs the ability of the Particles In Cell model to accurately predict the Multipactor power threshold of a component [10] [11].…”
Section: Multipactor Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To simplify the calculation, the geometric parameters are optimized with three of the seven variables mentioned above fixed (𝑅 iris = 40 mm, 𝐿 eff = 100 mm, 𝛼 = 75 • ), so only the remaining four variables (a, b, A, B) need to be optimized. The geometric parameters are optimized using CST Microwave Studio (MWS) [24]. First, the value of a/b is determined, and the result is shown in figure 3.…”
Section: Jinst 18 P04019mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An external magnetic field of 0.19 T is uniformly applied axially (z-coordinates). The PIC position monitor has been used to see particle trajectory at different time [10]. The simulation run time is 150 ns.…”
Section: Pic Simulation Of Hot Test Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, now in the recent years some powerful commercial software [5], [6] and hardware are available, which are very useful for electromagnetic and charge simulation leading to fast design and understanding of beam-wave interaction physics. Many publications on PIC simulation for oven magnetrons are available [7]- [10]. This paper is mainly oriented toward design studies of resonant system, known as anode block, of high power CW class of reentrant multicavity magnetrons through computer simulations and analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%