2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10916-009-9296-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D Image Analysis and Artificial Intelligence for Bone Disease Classification

Abstract: International audienceIn order to prevent bone fractures due to disease and ageing of the population, and to detect problems while still in their early stages, 3D bone micro architecture needs to be investigated and characterized. Here, we have developed various image processing and simulation techniques to investigate bone micro architecture and its mechanical stiffness. We have evaluated morphological, topological and mechanical bone features using artificial intelligence methods. A clinical study is carried… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2012 Thai, Hai, and Thuy [6] used the combination between feedforward artificial neural networks(FANN) with support vector machine (SVM) to classify Roman numeral images, the average classification rate was 86%. Akgundogdu et al [7], used support vector machine and genetic algorithm (GA) for bone sample images, with 12 training and 6 testing data, the success rate for SVM was equal 83.33%. Banerjee, et al [8], used artificial bee colony to classify band satellite images for different features, the accuracy rate for barren was equal 93.65%.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 2012 Thai, Hai, and Thuy [6] used the combination between feedforward artificial neural networks(FANN) with support vector machine (SVM) to classify Roman numeral images, the average classification rate was 86%. Akgundogdu et al [7], used support vector machine and genetic algorithm (GA) for bone sample images, with 12 training and 6 testing data, the success rate for SVM was equal 83.33%. Banerjee, et al [8], used artificial bee colony to classify band satellite images for different features, the accuracy rate for barren was equal 93.65%.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step3: compute the parameters of the model using equations(4), (6), (7). Step4: calculate the norm of distance utilizing equation (5).…”
Section: Gath-geva Fuzzy Clustering Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific descriptions of SVM and kNN are presented below. Brief Introduction of SVM Support vector machine is a supervised machinelearning method and has good performance on data classification (Akgundogdu et al, 2010). For a training dataset with two classes, SVM tries to find the best hyperplane to separate each class.…”
Section: Topological Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few studies in the literature highlighted the relationship between architecture of the trabecular bone and osteoporosis diagnosis based on information extracted from CT and magnetic resonance (MR) images of a femur region. [5][6][7][8][9][10] The trabecular bone structural parameters extracted from CT and MR images were compared against BMD values. 5,6 The morphological parameters extracted from CT images were classified into osteoporotic from osteoarthritis samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6 The morphological parameters extracted from CT images were classified into osteoporotic from osteoarthritis samples. 7 Texture features derived from clinical CT images have helped bring out the architectural information on trabecular bone. 8 High-dose radiological methods helped more on extracting structural information of femur specimen and assessed the bone strength for the diagnosis of osteoporosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%