2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11276-019-01983-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D geographical routing protocols in wireless ad hoc and sensor networks: an overview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several graph-theoretic or geometric techniques have been introduced to capture the border of the hole (as a polygon) [37,38]. A technique to bypass a hole in a 3D wireless sensor networks has also been proposed by [39].…”
Section: Hole-bypassing Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several graph-theoretic or geometric techniques have been introduced to capture the border of the hole (as a polygon) [37,38]. A technique to bypass a hole in a 3D wireless sensor networks has also been proposed by [39].…”
Section: Hole-bypassing Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the packet reaches the root, it get destroyed because the root is present in every sub-tree (that is, optimum local). To overcome this issue, the various 3D Geographic Routing Protocols have been proposed by researchers and the review of different protocols have discussed in [ 118 ]. Also, in this protocol,the data packet is transferred to UAV using the right-hand rule.…”
Section: Protocol Stack Development Of Flying Ad-hoc Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decrease happens from the 2D to 3D with distance 6m with a percentage for changing to 3D with distance of 10 m. Furthermore, the generalization of various VANETs models from 2D environment to 3D is still a challenge. In the work of [16], it is stated that Many geographical routing protocols based on greedy and face routing approach have been designed for 2D networks, but these protocols may not be suitable in 3D environment like hill area, airborne networks, underground networks, underwater networks and so forth.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%