“…The earliest three-dimensional models and simulations of cardiac valves FSI date back to the beginning of this century, [7][8][9][10] and since then, the topic has seen a surge of interest in the literature. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] In most of these studies, computational cost is recognized as a key difficulty, often related to the efficiency of the FSI coupling strategy, the treatment of solid contact, or the (fitted or unfitted) nature of the spatial discretization. Unfitted mesh methods, such as the immersed boundary 10,11,18 and the fictitious domain 7,8,13 methods, are generally preferred to the more traditional fitted mesh approaches 16,17 (based on an arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian [ALE] formalism).…”