2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41567-018-0268-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D field phase-space control in tokamak plasmas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
113
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
5
113
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In parallel, dedicated RMP spectral optimization studies have converged on the crucial role of maximizing resonant coupling to the edge rational surfaces [21,7,22], and if conditions require it, maximizing edge resonant coupling while holding core resonant coupling to a sufficiently low value to avoid penetration of the core resonant surfaces [10,23,24]. Though the reason ∆ up was so effective in AUG is not yet resolved, an increase in edge resonant coupling may partially explain this result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In parallel, dedicated RMP spectral optimization studies have converged on the crucial role of maximizing resonant coupling to the edge rational surfaces [21,7,22], and if conditions require it, maximizing edge resonant coupling while holding core resonant coupling to a sufficiently low value to avoid penetration of the core resonant surfaces [10,23,24]. Though the reason ∆ up was so effective in AUG is not yet resolved, an increase in edge resonant coupling may partially explain this result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 This method was first demonstrated in DIII-D 2 and thereafter observed on several tokamaks worldwide. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Various models have been proposed to explain the causes of ELM suppression, [10][11][12][13] however important characteristics of ELM suppression remain unexplained. One characteristic of ELM suppression in DIII-D low collisionality (ν * e <0.5) ITER-similar-shape (ISS) plasmas is the low pedestal density n e,ped ≈ 2-3×10 19 m -3 required for access to ELM suppression.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the operation window of the 'ELM' suppressed regime is quite limited and efforts to expand the operating window have been largely empirical. Recently a successful suppression experiment with a pre-designed polar diagram, calculated with IPEC code including the plasma response model, spanned by the amplitude and phase of RMP coils has been conducted [122]. Here, one can select the amplitude and phase of RMP coils to operate in the region where suppression of the 'ELM' is expected for given RMP coil configurations for a specific helicity and set of physical parameters.…”
Section: What Are the New Findings In The Study Of Alfvén Mode Instabmentioning
confidence: 99%