2011
DOI: 10.1002/9781119962762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D Displays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lueder [2012] presents a recent overview on the huge body of related work. We focus on lenticular displays for integral imaging, parallax barrier type displays, and multi-layer light field displays.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lueder [2012] presents a recent overview on the huge body of related work. We focus on lenticular displays for integral imaging, parallax barrier type displays, and multi-layer light field displays.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ray separation is often achieved by placing tiny lens arrays in front of an image surface. This lenticular technology is well suited to display 3D content in uncontrolled lighting environments, in contrast to other techniques such multi-layer or holographic displays [Lueder 2012]. Lenticular arrays have constant pitch and are arranged on a regular grid to accommodate the maximum possible depth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With polarization-based LCS and PPF setups, although full-color viewing of dichoptic stimuli is enabled, these methods can also cause the images to physically darken (Choubey et al, 2009;Pastoor & Wöpking, 1997;Stevens, 2004). For ATS displays, a number of related issues to consider include the following: (1) reduced image brightness in parallax ATS displays as half of the subpixel columns are blocked by the barrier (Choubey et al, 2009;Pastoor & Wöpking, 1997); (2) interpixel gaps (i.e., black mask matrix) in lenticular-type displays can be projected, causing dark regions to appear between observation zones (Holliman et al, 2011; though it can be resolved by slanting the monitor's lenticular lenses: Lipton & Feldman, 2002;Lipton et al, 1985;Lueder, 2011;van Berkel & Clarke, 1997); and (3) light scatter at lenticular lens boundaries causing variation in illumination intensity (Hill & Jacobs, 2006). Furthermore, because half of ATS monitor pixels are viewed by each eye, horizontal spatial resolution of each image is reduced by 50%.…”
Section: Image Viewing Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current article, we review traditional methods of stereoscopic viewing along with modern 3D display technology as further avenues for BR research. The latter methods that are surveyed include LCS goggles ( In the stereopsis and 3D display literature, classification of such viewing methods has been a common and recurring theme (e.g., Abileah, 2011Abileah, , 2013Benton, 2001;Benzie et al, 2007;Blundell, 2011;Borel & Doyen, 2012;Diner & Fender, 1993;Forman, 2012;Hodges, 1992;Holliman, 2006;Howard & Rogers, 2012;Järvenpää & Salmimna, 2008;Kejian & Fei, 2010;Konrad & Halle, 2007;Kovács & Balogh, 2010;Lee & Kim, 2012;Lee & Park, 2010;Lueder, 2011;Pastoor, 2005;Peddie, 2013;Su et al, 2013;Surman, 2013;Symanzik, 2011;Valyus, 1962;Urey et al, 2011). Most recently, the historical development of devices, hardware, and software for stereoscopic viewing was succinctly covered by Peddie (2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autostereoscopic display technology, on the other hand, relies only on the display device to project a specific image to each eye. However, this process initially requires detection of the face and location of the viewer by the device, and then, depends on applied technologies such as lenticular lenses or parallax barriers to project the source image to a particular eye location (Lueder, 2012).…”
Section: Representation Of Binocular Visionmentioning
confidence: 99%