3D display size matters: Compensating for the perceptual effects of S3D display scaling

Benzeroual, Karim; Allison, Robert S.; Wilcox, Laurie M.

doi:10.1109/cvprw.2012.6238907

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Mizobuchi et al [37], report that S3D text legibility was better when text was presented at zero disparity on a positive disparity background image when compared to presenting it hovering on a background image that was at zero disparity. It has also been pointed out that scaling the S3D content to different size displays is not straightforward, and has an effect to the perceptual qualities [2].…”

Section: Hci Research In S3dmentioning

confidence: 99%

Touch the 3rd Dimension! Understanding Stereoscopic 3D Touchscreen Interaction

Colley

Häkkilä

Schöning

et al. 2015

Computer-Human Interaction. Cognitive Effects of Spatial Interaction, Learning, and Ability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. The penetration of stereoscopic 3D (S3D) output devices is becoming widespread. S3D screens range in size from large cinema screens, to tabletop displays, TVs in living rooms, and even mobile devices are nowadays equipped with autostereoscopic 3D screens. As a consequence, the requirement for interacting with 3D content is also increasing, with "touch" being one of the dominant input methods. However, the design requirements and best practices for interaction with S3D touch screen user interfaces are only now evolving. To understand the challenges and limitations S3D technology brings to interaction design, and in particular the additional demands they place on the users of such interfaces, we present our research that considers stereoscopic touch screens of different sizes in static and mobile usage contexts. We report on perceptual, cognitive and behavioral aspects revealed by user studies and present interaction design requirements based on the findings.

show abstract

Section: Hci Research In S3dmentioning

confidence: 99%

Touch the 3rd Dimension! Understanding Stereoscopic 3D Touchscreen Interaction

Colley

Häkkilä

Schöning

et al. 2015

Computer-Human Interaction. Cognitive Effects of Spatial Interaction, Learning, and Ability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Mizobuchi et al, (2008), report that S3D text legibility was better when text was presented at zero disparity on a sinking background when compared to presenting it hovering on a background image that was presented in zero disparity. It has been also pointed out that scaling the S3D content to different size displays is not straightforward, and has an effect to the perceptual qualities (Benzeroual et al, 2012). The role of visual cues has been investigated.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Investigating mobile stereoscopic 3D touchscreen interaction

Colley

Häkkilä

Schöning

et al. 2013

Proceedings of the 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference: Augmentation, Application, Innovation, Collaboration

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT3D output is no longer limited to large screens in cinemas or living rooms. Nowadays more and more mobile devices are equipped with autostereoscopic 3D (S3D) touchscreens. As a consequence interaction with 3D content now also happens whilst users are on the move. In this paper we carried out a user study with 27 participants to assess how mobile interaction, i.e. whilst walking, with mobile S3D devices, differs from interaction with 2D mobile touchscreens. We investigate the difference in touch accuracy between 2D touchscreens and mobile S3D touchscreens and evaluate the minimum touch target size for mobile S3D touchscreens. The contributions of this paper are twofold: Firstly, we found the increase in minimum touch target size caused by walking was larger for a mobile S3D UI than for a 2D UI. Secondly, we present touch target sizes and aspect ratios required for reliable user interaction in each case. Additionally we examined differences in the angle at which users held the mobile S3D device compared to a 2D mobile device. We found that mobile S3D caused users to hold the device at a different angle when walking, compared to the 2D case. This first study of its kind provides valuable information to developers of the next generation of UIs and applications for mobile S3D displays and devices.

show abstract

3D Media and the Human Visual System

Watt

MacKenzie

2013

Emerging Technologies for 3D Video

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

3D display size matters: Compensating for the perceptual effects of S3D display scaling

Cited by 5 publications

References 20 publications

Touch the 3rd Dimension! Understanding Stereoscopic 3D Touchscreen Interaction

Touch the 3rd Dimension! Understanding Stereoscopic 3D Touchscreen Interaction

Investigating mobile stereoscopic 3D touchscreen interaction

3D Media and the Human Visual System

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About