2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2015.11.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D crack propagation with cohesive elements in the extended finite element method

Abstract: International audienceA model is presented that accurately describes brittle failure in the presence of cohesive forces, with a particular focus on the prediction of non planar crack paths. In comparison with earlier literature, the originality of the procedure lies in the a posteriori computation of the crack advance from the equilibrium, instead of a most common determination beforehand from the stress state ahead of the front. To this aim, a robust way of introducing brittle non-smooth cohesive laws in the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
3
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning the irreducible formulation, the results shows a clear mesh bias, with a relatively small twisting rotation for the isotropic damage case and almost no twisting at all in the case of plasticity. Figure 9 depicts the relative position of the computed crack path with respect to the notch location compared to the experimental results reported by Citarella and Buchholz [47] and the XFEM numerical simulation of Ferté et al [48]. Once again, standard displacement based finite elements are unable to provide a satisfactory result, with the crack having a marked tendency to follow one of the directions of the mesh, independently from the constitutive law.…”
Section: Associative Plasticity Model Isotropic Continuum Damage Modelmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Concerning the irreducible formulation, the results shows a clear mesh bias, with a relatively small twisting rotation for the isotropic damage case and almost no twisting at all in the case of plasticity. Figure 9 depicts the relative position of the computed crack path with respect to the notch location compared to the experimental results reported by Citarella and Buchholz [47] and the XFEM numerical simulation of Ferté et al [48]. Once again, standard displacement based finite elements are unable to provide a satisfactory result, with the crack having a marked tendency to follow one of the directions of the mesh, independently from the constitutive law.…”
Section: Associative Plasticity Model Isotropic Continuum Damage Modelmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The initial profile of the localization band coincides in all four examples: the surface develops from Figure 9: Plot of the computed crack path with respect to the experimental data from Citarella and Buchholz [47] and previous results from Ferté et al [48]. the two opposite inner corners of the notch and connects (almost) symmetrically at the center of the specimen.…”
Section: Associative Plasticity Model Isotropic Continuum Damage Modelmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The element of set E is composed of the fracture in DFN. Set W is computed by Equations (6) and (7) (5) and (6), γ = 1.0 × 10 6 J/m in Equation (7). Based on Definition 2.2-2.3 in Section 2, p ij = (v i , u j ) presents the weight from v i to u j (i, j = 1, 2, ..., 12), and δ(u, v) represents the shortest path with the minimum sum of the fracture weights.…”
Section: Determination Of the Hydraulic Fracturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mohammadnejad and Khoei used a fully coupled extended finite element method for hydraulic fracture propagation of porous media [6]. Ferté et al combined extended the finite element method and cohesive zone models to predict crack paths and to compute the crack deflection angle [7]. Fu et al simulated hydraulic fracturing in arbitrary discrete fracture networks by using an explicit coupling simulation strategy [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%