2017
DOI: 10.1364/ao.56.003411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D cost aggregation with multiple minimum spanning trees for stereo matching

Abstract: Cost aggregation is one of the key steps in the stereo matching problem. In order to improve aggregation accuracy, we propose a cost-aggregation method that can embed minimum spanning tree (MST)-based support region filtering into PatchMatch 3D label search rather than aggregating on fixed size patches. However, directly combining PatchMatch label search and MST filtering is not straightforward, due to the extremely high complexity. Thus, we develop multiple MST structures for cost aggregation on plenty of 3D … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we compare our method against the state-of-the-art methods on the Middlebury benchmark dataset. We consider the top five methods from the Middlebury benchmark table: LocalExp [33], 3DMST [20], PMSC [21], MeshStere-oExt [44], NTDE [13]. Our algorithm achieves similar results as state-of-the-art for average (avrg), root-mean-squared (rms), A90, and A95 error metrics.…”
Section: A Comparison To State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Here we compare our method against the state-of-the-art methods on the Middlebury benchmark dataset. We consider the top five methods from the Middlebury benchmark table: LocalExp [33], 3DMST [20], PMSC [21], MeshStere-oExt [44], NTDE [13]. Our algorithm achieves similar results as state-of-the-art for average (avrg), root-mean-squared (rms), A90, and A95 error metrics.…”
Section: A Comparison To State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the paper [20], the authors propose a cost-aggregation method that embeds a minimum spanning tree based support region filtering in the general procedure. Furthermore, it combines this approach with a PatchMatch 3D label search, thus performing the search process with an adaptive patch size.…”
Section: A Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since our model, especially our data term borrowed from [5], does not consider such new difficulties, we here slightly modify our model for adapting it to the latest benchmark. To this end, we incorporate the state-of-the-art CNN-based matching cost function by Zbontar and LeCun [49], by following manners of current top methods [10], [20], [28], [29] on the latest benchmark. Here, we only replace our pixelwise raw matching cost function ρ(·) of Eq.…”
Section: Evaluation On the Middlebury Benchmark V3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CBMV disparity map Figure 1. The left view of Djembe stereo dataset [34] along with the disparity map computed by CBMV [2,6,8,15,18,37,38,43]. Our goal is similar to MC-CNN, since we also aim to estimate a matching volume that can be used as input to various optimization algorithms enabling them to produce highly accurate disparity maps.…”
Section: Djembementioning
confidence: 99%