2021
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202100359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D Confinement Strategy for Dendrite‐Free Sodium Metal Batteries

Abstract: Sodium metal batteries (SMBs) are attracting extensive attention for large‐scale energy storage due to the abundant reserves and low cost of sodium. However, the inevitable side reactions and uncontrollable dendrite growth in SMBs result in a continuous deterioration of the electrochemical performance and induce serious safety concerns, which severely restrict its practical application in the future. Among various improvement strategies, the 3D confinement strategy demonstrates great potential for stabilizing … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pursuit of future energy-dense low-cost metal-based batteries (e.g., Na) has stimulated tremendous efforts in constructing robust interphases to tackle intrinsic interfacial instability, as ultimately being manifested as uncontrolled dendrite growth with serious performance deterioration ( 1 4 ). Approaches including optimizing electrolytes ( 5 , 6 ), constructing solid-state electrolytes ( 7 , 8 ), designing artificial protective layers ( 9 11 ), and engineering porous three-dimensional scaffolds ( 12 16 ) have thus been developed for various metal anodes. The resulting anodes, Na specifically, demonstrate promising potentials with mitigated dendritic growth and boosted plating/stripping stability ( 4 , 12 ), whereas modulation of sodiophilic nucleation sites has been recognized as one of the most underlying factors for navigating the initial Na nucleation behavior and subsequent growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pursuit of future energy-dense low-cost metal-based batteries (e.g., Na) has stimulated tremendous efforts in constructing robust interphases to tackle intrinsic interfacial instability, as ultimately being manifested as uncontrolled dendrite growth with serious performance deterioration ( 1 4 ). Approaches including optimizing electrolytes ( 5 , 6 ), constructing solid-state electrolytes ( 7 , 8 ), designing artificial protective layers ( 9 11 ), and engineering porous three-dimensional scaffolds ( 12 16 ) have thus been developed for various metal anodes. The resulting anodes, Na specifically, demonstrate promising potentials with mitigated dendritic growth and boosted plating/stripping stability ( 4 , 12 ), whereas modulation of sodiophilic nucleation sites has been recognized as one of the most underlying factors for navigating the initial Na nucleation behavior and subsequent growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the high theoretical specific capacity (1165 mAh g −1 ) and low standard electrode potential (−2.71 V vs the standard hydrogen electrode) of metallic sodium (Na) anode, sodium metal batteries (SMBs) are regarded as one of the most prospective secondary rechargeable energy‐storage equipment. [ 1 3 ] However, the practical application of Na anode is hindered by the following two aspects: 1) Owing to the high chemical reactivity, metallic Na easily reacts with electrolyte to form unstable solid electrolyte interface (SEI). [ 4,5 ] During the repeated plating/stripping processes, the huge volume variety of Na anode unavoidably causes the fracture of SEI layer; thus the newly exposed metallic Na will be consumed in constant contact with the electrolyte, finally leading to the depletion of electrolyte and poor Coulombic efficiency (CE).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One may doubt that enlarging the specific surface area of current collectors to reduce the local current density can significantly lower the nucleation overpotential. [ 31,34–36 ] However, in our case, the specific surface area of CMFS (246.7 m 2 g –1 ) is obviously lower than that of CFS (489.2 m 2 g –1 ), as demonstrated in Figure S10 (Supporting Information). Hence, the optimized nucleation behavior of CMFS is mainly attributed to the improved disorder degree, the increased defect concentration and correspondingly the enhanced “sodiophilic” property of the CMFS electrode.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 50%