2021
DOI: 10.1007/s42242-021-00165-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D bioprinting: current status and trends—a guide to the literature and industrial practice

Abstract: The multidisciplinary research field of bioprinting combines additive manufacturing, biology and material sciences to create bioconstructs with three-dimensional architectures mimicking natural living tissues. The high interest in the possibility of reproducing biological tissues and organs is further boosted by the ever-increasing need for personalized medicine, thus allowing bioprinting to establish itself in the field of biomedical research, and attracting extensive research efforts from companies, universi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 260 publications
(252 reference statements)
0
65
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Individual publications show groundbreaking results on how the use of automation solutions can help to monitor and adjust crucial process parameters and to draw conclusions about cell biological characteristics or allow the printing of complex 3D structures with hydrogels ( Hinton et al, 2015 ; Shi et al, 2018 ; Armstrong et al, 2019 ; Jin et al, 2021 ; Poologasundarampillai et al, 2021 ; Yang et al, 2021 ). At the same time, the number of patents and companies embracing 3D-Bioprinting continue to grow ( Santoni et al, 2021 ). However, no technology has yet achieved the major breakthrough to commercial marketing and industrial production for a broad mass ( Ng et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Individual publications show groundbreaking results on how the use of automation solutions can help to monitor and adjust crucial process parameters and to draw conclusions about cell biological characteristics or allow the printing of complex 3D structures with hydrogels ( Hinton et al, 2015 ; Shi et al, 2018 ; Armstrong et al, 2019 ; Jin et al, 2021 ; Poologasundarampillai et al, 2021 ; Yang et al, 2021 ). At the same time, the number of patents and companies embracing 3D-Bioprinting continue to grow ( Santoni et al, 2021 ). However, no technology has yet achieved the major breakthrough to commercial marketing and industrial production for a broad mass ( Ng et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since its beginnings, the technology has already evolved greatly, advancing from a niche technology further and further into a wide variety of sectors to fulfill prerequisites for commercial applications ( Combellack et al, 2018 ). During this development, automation is also becoming increasingly important in the context of process-driven research of 3D-Bioprinting in order to meet standardized, scalable and economic constraints ( Santoni et al, 2021 ). Modern 3D-Bioprinting itself requires a certain level of automation to be functional, which leads to the current state of the art.…”
Section: 1 Analysis Of the Automation Potential Of The Most Prominent...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the construction of 3D hollowed network structures of in vitro BBB models has not been achieved. A similar limitation representing a significant challenge in the biofabrication of normal vasculature has been addressed using sophisticated 3D printing and bioprinting methods, including inkjet, laser-assisted, micro-extrusion, and vat-polymerization bioprinting ( Aazmi et al., 2021 ; Santoni et al., 2021 ; Wang et al., 2021 ; Zhu et al., 2021b ).…”
Section: Challenge and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Vijayavenkataraman et al, no one method could be excursively used to achieve the goal of biofabrication of complex tissue, the current trend being research in the development of hybrid methods [94]. Extrusion bioprinting: The most common 3DBP method is the extrusion-based one, mainly because it is versatile and affordable, and several entry-level bioprinters are available on the market [95]. Kang et al, for example, successfully used it to bioprint meatlike constructs [96].…”
Section: D Bioprinting Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%