2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.110905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D-bioprinted functional and biomimetic hydrogel scaffolds incorporated with nanosilicates to promote bone healing in rat calvarial defect model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
3
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the ALP activity values for the cells seeded on the PCL@CMC/LAP3.5% scaffold were significantly higher than those for the cells on the PCL@CMC scaffold ( P ≤ .001). These results agree with previous reports about enhancing the osteodifferentiation of stem cells on polymeric scaffolds containing LAP nanoplatelets 1,25,35 …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Furthermore, the ALP activity values for the cells seeded on the PCL@CMC/LAP3.5% scaffold were significantly higher than those for the cells on the PCL@CMC scaffold ( P ≤ .001). These results agree with previous reports about enhancing the osteodifferentiation of stem cells on polymeric scaffolds containing LAP nanoplatelets 1,25,35 …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The use of this biodegradable polymer along with the GET peptide controlled release delivery system would allow new in-vivo applications, especially in bone regeneration. The ability to paste the scaffold at a defect site can offer improved clinical translation when compared to metallic implants [ 1 ]. Moreover, this material can be formulated with simple addition of PF127 and Tri-acetin to be 3D printable as demonstrated here; which gives the ability to fill complex and difficult to reach geometric defects or as a pre-fabricated implant [ 2 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additive manufacturing of custom, defect-matched implants for regenerative medicine has significantly developed over the last decade [ 1 ]. For bone tissue engineering these approaches employ ceramic and polymeric materials to enable bone-like mechanically strong scaffolds to be generated, however the manufacturing process may not be bio-compatible (using high-temperatures, UV-light or organic solvents) [ 2 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Third, these multifunctional Nb 2 C@SiR NSs were integrated onto the 3D-printing biodegradable bioglass (BG) scaffolds (denoted as BG@NbSiR scaffolds). In particular, mesoporous Nb 2 C@Si NSs not only endowed the as-fabricated scaffolds with excellent photonic hyperthermia property under near-infrared light (NIR) irradiation, [15] but also enhanced the bone-regeneration process due to their degradation products of Nb- [16] and Si-based [17] species. R837 offered immune-activating function, [18] and 3D-printing BG scaffolds supplied the personalized substrate for bone healing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%