2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.04.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D biomaterial matrix to support long term, full thickness, immuno-competent human skin equivalents with nervous system components

Abstract: Current commercially available human skin equivalents (HSEs) are used for relatively short term studies (∼1 week) due in part to the time-dependent contraction of the collagen gel-based matrix and the limited cell types and skin tissue components utilized. In contrast, here we describe a new matrix consisting of a silk-collagen composite system that provides long term, stable cultivation with reduced contraction and degradation over time. This matrix supports full thickness skin equivalents which include nerve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(77 reference statements)
0
65
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have mainly used single hydrogel‐type materials as scaffolds such as a collagen–elastin matrix (Keck et al, ), fibrin hydrogel (Kober, Gugerell, Schmid, Kamolz, & Keck, ), human plasma hydrogel (Monfort, Soriano‐Navarro, García‐Verdugo, & Izeta, ), and collagen type I hydrogel (Birgit et al, ) to construct a dermis–fat composite. ADSCs cell sheets have been used to construct a three‐layer skin substitute containing subcutaneous fat in vitro without application of scaffold materials (Vidal et al, ); in another study, the dermis and hypodermis were constructed using a silk–collagen hydrogel and silk sponge respectively, and the two layers were then overlapped to form a full‐thickness skin equivalent (Bellas, Seiberg, Garlick, & Kaplan, ). Although these hydrogel‐based products are useful skin substitutes for skin biology research or cosmetic and pharmaceutical testing, their mechanical properties should be improved for in vivo applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have mainly used single hydrogel‐type materials as scaffolds such as a collagen–elastin matrix (Keck et al, ), fibrin hydrogel (Kober, Gugerell, Schmid, Kamolz, & Keck, ), human plasma hydrogel (Monfort, Soriano‐Navarro, García‐Verdugo, & Izeta, ), and collagen type I hydrogel (Birgit et al, ) to construct a dermis–fat composite. ADSCs cell sheets have been used to construct a three‐layer skin substitute containing subcutaneous fat in vitro without application of scaffold materials (Vidal et al, ); in another study, the dermis and hypodermis were constructed using a silk–collagen hydrogel and silk sponge respectively, and the two layers were then overlapped to form a full‐thickness skin equivalent (Bellas, Seiberg, Garlick, & Kaplan, ). Although these hydrogel‐based products are useful skin substitutes for skin biology research or cosmetic and pharmaceutical testing, their mechanical properties should be improved for in vivo applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One group developed a hybrid model of human skin with axonal growth of rat DRG neurites into the dermis . In another study, the authors developed a skin model using neonatal foreskin fibroblasts and keratinocytes, coated with human‐induced neural stem cells . Recently, a fully human‐derived and innervated skin model using fibroblasts and keratinocytes from breast reductive surgeries was developed .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a fully human‐derived and innervated skin model using fibroblasts and keratinocytes from breast reductive surgeries was developed . The major drawbacks for the methodological transfer into clinical studies are the need of large skin samples, juvenile and highly proliferative cells as prerequisites, or hybrid models obtained from different species, which are either not practicable in clinical routine or does not reflect real‐life conditions. Moreover, these tools do not model disease conditions since skin cells and neurons derived from healthy donors were included.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only one model system has addressed all components simultaneously. 16,22 However, the human-induced neural stem cells (hiNSCs) employed by these studies have additional considerations. First, although these are primary human-derived cells and they express several relevant neuronal markers, 23 an ideal innervation model would utilize human dorsal root ganglia, which are not readily accessible for in vitro research, thus presenting a challenge.…”
Section: Merkel Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%