2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpe.2016.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D Anatomy Models and Impact on Learning: A Review of the Quality of the Literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
134
1
15

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
5
134
1
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Anatomy textbooks and atlases provide limited benefit with regards to 3D visualization of structures as they present static 2D images (Langlois et al, ). The visual‐spatial ability to mentally manipulate a 3D structure and recognize its features is becoming increasingly important as time with appropriate anatomical models is reduced and reliance on 2D images is increased (Azer and Azer, ). In a recent review of available studies of 3D anatomical models, Azer and Azer () failed to identify clear benefits of 3D models over traditional teaching methods using 2D representations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Anatomy textbooks and atlases provide limited benefit with regards to 3D visualization of structures as they present static 2D images (Langlois et al, ). The visual‐spatial ability to mentally manipulate a 3D structure and recognize its features is becoming increasingly important as time with appropriate anatomical models is reduced and reliance on 2D images is increased (Azer and Azer, ). In a recent review of available studies of 3D anatomical models, Azer and Azer () failed to identify clear benefits of 3D models over traditional teaching methods using 2D representations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The visual‐spatial ability to mentally manipulate a 3D structure and recognize its features is becoming increasingly important as time with appropriate anatomical models is reduced and reliance on 2D images is increased (Azer and Azer, ). In a recent review of available studies of 3D anatomical models, Azer and Azer () failed to identify clear benefits of 3D models over traditional teaching methods using 2D representations. While some studies showed better outcomes using traditional teaching, other showed benefits using the 3D models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this principle, it can be presumed that learning in a virtual environment would be a type of contrived experience simulated in a virtual world where the user is actively performing tasks and essentially learning by doing. However, based on the results from previous studies (Azer & Azer, 2016;Berney, Betrancourt, Molinari, & Hoyek, 2015;Codd & Choudhury, 2011;Hu et al, 2009;Keedy et al, 2011;Kockro et al, 2015) there was no significant improvement in the results of students that studied anatomy in 3D environment in comparison to a 2D environment. The reason for these results could be either due to the lack of realism to simulate a contrived experience or due to a poor anatomical model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The analysis of scientific literature has shown that the set of such technologies is limited. 3D-technology is often used to study human anatomy in medical schools (Azer, Azer, 2016;Nikonorova, 2013;Ratova et al, 2012). S.A. Azer and S. Azer noted that the spatial visualization of the anatomical structure of the human with the use of 3D-technology is required for teaching of the discipline and allows students to understand the dynamic aspects of the functioning of organs and systems.…”
Section: D-technology In Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%