2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D analysis of condylar remodelling and skeletal relapse following bilateral sagittal split advancement osteotomies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
103
1
11

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(47 reference statements)
2
103
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to differences in study methodologies, however, a wide range of values have been reported . Furthermore, torsion of the condyle‐ramus segment during fixation of proximal and distal bony segments in mandibular surgery may provoke post‐surgical condylar remodelling, resorption and potential long‐term instability of surgical correction …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to differences in study methodologies, however, a wide range of values have been reported . Furthermore, torsion of the condyle‐ramus segment during fixation of proximal and distal bony segments in mandibular surgery may provoke post‐surgical condylar remodelling, resorption and potential long‐term instability of surgical correction …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9] Furthermore, torsion of the condyle-ramus segment during fixation of proximal and distal bony segments in mandibular surgery may provoke post-surgical condylar remodelling, resorption and potential long-term instability of surgical correction. [10][11][12][13][14][15] While studies have examined the accuracy of VSP-guided surgeries through the measurement of distal segment landmarks, no studies to our knowledge have quantified post-surgical condylar position changes in cases planned using VSP vs. conventional methods. In particular, there have been no reports on condylar positional changes identified using superimposed pre-and post-surgical 3D images, which overcomes many of the limitations and inaccuracies of measuring skeletal changes in 2D images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En la selección de pacientes para los estudios observacionales revisados no existen grandes diferen-cias en cómo los autores determinan los criterios de inclusión, excepto en los estudios de Nogami et al (2016) y Gomes et al (2017) que aclaran que los pacientes incluidos eran pacientes de sexo femenino que presentaban osteoartritis previa. En relación a los criterios de exclusión, los estudios presentan en general los mismos parámetros, excluyendo pacientes que presentaran síndromes de las bases craneales (fisuras labio palatinas, por ejemplo), enfermedades sistémicas de carácter degenerativo o intervenciones previas en la articulación temporomandibular (Kerstens et al, 1990;Merkx & Van Damme, 1994;de Mol van Otterloo et al, 1993;Bouwman et al, 1994Bouwman et al, , 1997De Clercq et al, 1994;Scheerlinck et al, 1994;Cutbirth et al, 1998;Hoppenreijs et al, 1998;Hwang et al, 2000aHwang et al, ,b, 2004Wolford et al, 2002Wolford et al, , 2003Borstlap et al, 2004;Wohlwender et al, 2011;Kobayashi et al, 2012;Xi et al, 2015;Nogami et al;Gomes et al).…”
Section: Resultados Y Discusiónunclassified
“…Moreover, if percent volume loss is in the future is used to differentiate pathologic from physiologic condylar resorption, CBCT will be very valuable in that diagnostic process. [27]…”
Section: Diagnosis and Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They, therefore, suggested considering a 17% loss of the condylar volume as the lower threshold for diagnosing PCR, but stated a larger sample size is needed to be more conclusive. [27]…”
Section: Comparison To Physiologic Condylar Resorption (Or Condylar Rmentioning
confidence: 99%