2001
DOI: 10.1023/a:1013655819336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data sampling and analysis. The cores for dendrochronological analysis were selected in accordance with the generally accepted method (Drápela, Zach 1995;Shiyatov et al 2000;Matveev 2001): cores were collected from 15 trees (2 cores per tree). After visual inspection, cores were excluded from further measurements (were rejected) if damaged, with defects that passed far from the centre.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data sampling and analysis. The cores for dendrochronological analysis were selected in accordance with the generally accepted method (Drápela, Zach 1995;Shiyatov et al 2000;Matveev 2001): cores were collected from 15 trees (2 cores per tree). After visual inspection, cores were excluded from further measurements (were rejected) if damaged, with defects that passed far from the centre.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%