2001
DOI: 10.1023/a:1015040231965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The deviation of these data from the value obtained by RHF/6-31G(d) (26.7 kcal/mole) is -6.2 kcal/mole, 7.2 kcal/mole, 0.2 kcal/mole, 4.9 kcal/mole, -1.3 kcal/mole, -2.3 kcal/mole, -2.0 kcal/mole, -1.4 kcal/mole, 4.1 kcal/mole, and -1.9 kcal/mole, respectively, or 23.2%, 27.0%, 0.8%, 18.4%, 4.9%, 8.6%, 7.5%, 5.2%, 15.4%, and 7.1%, respectively. One can conclude that the above-mentioned semiempirical methods (AM1 [1], PM3) and the RHF/6-31G(d)/RHF/STO-2G technique, as well as RHF/STO-2G, RHF/3-21G, and RHF/6-31G, provide information about the magnitude of changes in the H bond energy in the compounds under study, which is in reasonable agreement with the data of RHF/6-31G(d) calculations (Table 5) [1,12]. The ab initio methods of calculation, where geometry optimization is fulfilled in one approximation and the energy of a structure is calculated in another (in particular, at second order Möller Plesset level of theory), obviously slightly exaggerate the strength of H bonds in calix [4]arene; as a result, changes in H bond energy obtained by these methods approximate the value obtained by RHF/STO-2G.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The deviation of these data from the value obtained by RHF/6-31G(d) (26.7 kcal/mole) is -6.2 kcal/mole, 7.2 kcal/mole, 0.2 kcal/mole, 4.9 kcal/mole, -1.3 kcal/mole, -2.3 kcal/mole, -2.0 kcal/mole, -1.4 kcal/mole, 4.1 kcal/mole, and -1.9 kcal/mole, respectively, or 23.2%, 27.0%, 0.8%, 18.4%, 4.9%, 8.6%, 7.5%, 5.2%, 15.4%, and 7.1%, respectively. One can conclude that the above-mentioned semiempirical methods (AM1 [1], PM3) and the RHF/6-31G(d)/RHF/STO-2G technique, as well as RHF/STO-2G, RHF/3-21G, and RHF/6-31G, provide information about the magnitude of changes in the H bond energy in the compounds under study, which is in reasonable agreement with the data of RHF/6-31G(d) calculations (Table 5) [1,12]. The ab initio methods of calculation, where geometry optimization is fulfilled in one approximation and the energy of a structure is calculated in another (in particular, at second order Möller Plesset level of theory), obviously slightly exaggerate the strength of H bonds in calix [4]arene; as a result, changes in H bond energy obtained by these methods approximate the value obtained by RHF/STO-2G.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The energies of cooperative hydrogen bonds in calix [4]arene and calix [6]arene were calculated by the procedure suggested by P. Grootenhuis [1] and applied previously [12]. At first we determined the energy of the neutral compound relative to the energy of the monoanion obtained by proton elimination from the optimized neutral structure of the cone conformer of calix [4]arene or compressed cone conformer of calix [6]arene and subsequently optimized with the same level of accuracy as for the neutral conformer (Grad RMS = 10 -6 Hartree/Bohr):…”
Section: Calculation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations