Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 and 8 show the density deviations of the present measurements for, respectively, R-600 and R-600a from the EoS by Miyamoto and Watanabe [24,25]. Both figures show that the present data agree with the EoS by Miyamoto and Watanabe [24,25] within ±0.4% in density except for a few points and have a similar systematic trend to the existing data. Similar comparisons for the mixtures are now discussed.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Equations Of Statesupporting
confidence: 80%
“…7 and 8 show the density deviations of the present measurements for, respectively, R-600 and R-600a from the EoS by Miyamoto and Watanabe [24,25]. Both figures show that the present data agree with the EoS by Miyamoto and Watanabe [24,25] within ±0.4% in density except for a few points and have a similar systematic trend to the existing data. Similar comparisons for the mixtures are now discussed.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Equations Of Statesupporting
confidence: 80%
“…For the purpose of comparison of the present statistical model with available analytical models, we have selected the thermodynamic models for hydrocarbons recently published by Miyamoto and Watanabe [6][7][8][9] which cover a wide range of temperatures and pressures. For propane the equation covers from the triple point temperature (85.48 K) to 623 K, at pressures up to 103 MPa, and at densities up to 741 kg · m −3 ; for n-butane from 134.87 to 589 K, at pressures up to 69 MPa, and at densities up to 745 kg · m −3 ; and for isobutane from 113.56 K (the triple point temperature) to 573 K, at pressures up to 35 MPa, and at densities up to 749 kg · m −3 .…”
Section: Results and Comparison With Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these equations have exhibited some noticeable defects, such as poor agreement with experimental data at moderate densities. On the other hand, we can use complex equations of state with many constants (Benedict-Webb-Rubin [1] (BWR) EOS, Lee-Kessler [1] EOS, Benedict-Webb-Rubin-Starling-Nishiumi [1] EOS, modified BWR [1,2] (MBWR) EOS, Jacobsen-Stewart (JS) [2,3] EOS, Tillner-Roth-Watanabe-Wagner (TRWW) [4][5][6][7][8][9] EOS, etc.). These equations are more complicated and highly accurate for states where data are available, but they have no insight into the microstructure of matter and often exhibit poor agreement with experimental data outside interpolation limits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations