“…Administrative privileges were a point of particular contention in the accreditation actions (Enright et al, 1990; Enright et al, 1993; Litwin, Boswell, & Kraft, 1991; Zaro et al, 1982), with it being noted that as few as 3% of psychologists had administrative privileges (Dörken & Webb, 1979). This debate continued into the contemporary literature, with at least some ambiguity in the field with respect to the proportion of psychologists interested in taking administrative roles (Lechner & Stucky, 2000). These conflicts notwithstanding, very positive collaborations with psychiatry were also highlighted (Enright, 1985; Layman, 1943), usually framed as being the result of clearly articulated roles, mutual education and respect (Bush, 2005; Gunzburg, 1956; Rapaport, 1944; Stevens, 1944), and as a necessity for psychologists to develop autonomy within hospitals (Lechner & Stucky, 2000; Tovian et al, 2003).…”