Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results do not agree with the very high, ∼ 80%, radiative efficiency values, obtained in the calculations of Beloborodov (2000) and Kobayashi & Sari (2001) by assuming wind Lorentz factor distributions extending from Γ m ∼ 10 to Γ M ∼ > 10 4 . In our opinion the minimum wind Lorentz factor must be significantly higher than 10 (as otherwise the wind becomes optically thick) while the maximum Lorentz factor can not significantly exceed 10 3 (due to the acceleration process limitations).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our results do not agree with the very high, ∼ 80%, radiative efficiency values, obtained in the calculations of Beloborodov (2000) and Kobayashi & Sari (2001) by assuming wind Lorentz factor distributions extending from Γ m ∼ 10 to Γ M ∼ > 10 4 . In our opinion the minimum wind Lorentz factor must be significantly higher than 10 (as otherwise the wind becomes optically thick) while the maximum Lorentz factor can not significantly exceed 10 3 (due to the acceleration process limitations).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The case of a lognormal LF distribution can be considered as an intermediate case between the random and bimodal ones. In this case the maximal radiative efficiency expected is of the order 10-15%, much lower than the 80-90% value derived in Beloborodov (2000). This is due to the pair optical depth, which sets a lower limit of Γ m ∼ > 100 for an optically thin wind (see §3.2 below), and to the constraint imposed on the maximum LF by finite source size, Γ M < η * ∼ 10 3.5 .…”
Section: Based Onmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations