2003
DOI: 10.1023/a:1022406831709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, to our knowledge none of them are capable of reflecting the inheritance patterns of individual mutations through the successive rounds of seed amplifications, line crossing or mutagenesis encountered in a typical research laboratory. Indeed, most programs have been designed for managers of plant transformation or greenhouse facilities that use standardized procedures (Scott et al, 2003; Henry et al, 2008; Kohl and Gremmels, 2010; Hanke et al, 2014), or for plant breeding laboratories facing large sets of phenotyping and genotyping data derived from accession sequencing or QTL mapping (Lee et al, 2005; Jung et al, 2011; Milc et al, 2011; Love et al, 2012). Nevertheless, several software programs have been developed to track plant lines in basic research laboratories, such as PlantDB and Phytotracker (Exner et al, 2008; Nieuwland et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to our knowledge none of them are capable of reflecting the inheritance patterns of individual mutations through the successive rounds of seed amplifications, line crossing or mutagenesis encountered in a typical research laboratory. Indeed, most programs have been designed for managers of plant transformation or greenhouse facilities that use standardized procedures (Scott et al, 2003; Henry et al, 2008; Kohl and Gremmels, 2010; Hanke et al, 2014), or for plant breeding laboratories facing large sets of phenotyping and genotyping data derived from accession sequencing or QTL mapping (Lee et al, 2005; Jung et al, 2011; Milc et al, 2011; Love et al, 2012). Nevertheless, several software programs have been developed to track plant lines in basic research laboratories, such as PlantDB and Phytotracker (Exner et al, 2008; Nieuwland et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%