2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.100819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

39MO Clinical evaluation of a low-coverage whole-genome test for homologous recombination deficiency detection in ovarian cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a testimony to the test’s ease of implementation, we observe an increase in the number of patients for which HRD status could be established relative to the alternative method. In addition, when the present results are compared to the results of recently developed alternative HRD detection solutions validated using a subset of the original PAOLA-1, we found that GIInger displays a higher accuracy, a lower rejection rate than the alternative tests, or both 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 ( Table S4 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…As a testimony to the test’s ease of implementation, we observe an increase in the number of patients for which HRD status could be established relative to the alternative method. In addition, when the present results are compared to the results of recently developed alternative HRD detection solutions validated using a subset of the original PAOLA-1, we found that GIInger displays a higher accuracy, a lower rejection rate than the alternative tests, or both 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 ( Table S4 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…sWGS HRD is based on the number of large-scale genomic alteration (LGA) which is defined as intra-chromosome arm CNA breaks with adjacent segments ≥ 10 Mb. While this specific algorithm has not yet been approved for clinical use in ovarian cancer, HRD signatures on sWGS by different academic (SWGS v2) and commercial (SeqOne HRD score) algorithms are undergoing validation in clinical samples from patients in phase III trials of PARPi (PALOA-1) [ 19 , 20 ]. Our results support that genomic instability testing is feasible on cftDNA from peritoneal fluid.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%