2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2018.12.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

36Cl measurements with a gas-filled magnet at 6 MV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A 35 Cl‐enriched spike (Ivy‐Ochs et al, ) was added, and the samples were dissolved with HNO 3 (Prager et al, ). Measurements of 36 Cl were conducted at the Laboratory of Ion Beam Physics 6 MV TANDEM AMS system at ETH‐Zürich using a gas‐filled magnet to separate the isobar 36 S (Vockenhuber et al, ) and calibrated with the internal K382/4N standard (Christl et al, ). The AMS data with and without blank correction are shown in Table S6.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 35 Cl‐enriched spike (Ivy‐Ochs et al, ) was added, and the samples were dissolved with HNO 3 (Prager et al, ). Measurements of 36 Cl were conducted at the Laboratory of Ion Beam Physics 6 MV TANDEM AMS system at ETH‐Zürich using a gas‐filled magnet to separate the isobar 36 S (Vockenhuber et al, ) and calibrated with the internal K382/4N standard (Christl et al, ). The AMS data with and without blank correction are shown in Table S6.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement of both 37 Cl/ 35 Cl as well as 36 Cl/Cl ratios is with the 6 MV tandem accelerator at Ion Beam Physics, ETH Zurich. 36 Cl/Cl ratios were measured against the ETH internal standard K382/4N with a value of 36 Cl/Cl = 17.36 × 10 −12 which has been calibrated to international AMS standards (Vockenhuber et al, 2019). Sample ratios were corrected for a blank value of 3.2 × 10 −15 .…”
Section: Cosmogenic Nuclide Surface Exposure Datingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Vockenhuber et al . ). Uncertainties on reported concentrations (1σ) include AMS standard reproducibility, counting statistics, and the standard mean error of the samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%