2014
DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2014.901961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

360 degree feedback: an integrative framework for learning and assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
27
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…constructivist learning theory [ 7 ] and active learning - in the framework of andragogy (adult learning) - in large and in small group setting [ 9 ]. Specific modules included the use of active learning and technology in a large group setting, facilitation skills in a small-group setting, writing reflections [ 2 , 4 ] and methods for evaluation of the students with an emphasis on providing effective feedback [ 20 ], as well as advanced practical skills in cadaveric dissection (similar to [ 11 ]). Hands-on sessions in ultrasound and guest lectures by specialists were also parts of the program.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…constructivist learning theory [ 7 ] and active learning - in the framework of andragogy (adult learning) - in large and in small group setting [ 9 ]. Specific modules included the use of active learning and technology in a large group setting, facilitation skills in a small-group setting, writing reflections [ 2 , 4 ] and methods for evaluation of the students with an emphasis on providing effective feedback [ 20 ], as well as advanced practical skills in cadaveric dissection (similar to [ 11 ]). Hands-on sessions in ultrasound and guest lectures by specialists were also parts of the program.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students were expected to learn from the process by considering the opinion of their team members, as well their own perception of their performance. Therefore, a 360 degree assessment (Tee & Ahmed, ) was performed using a progress assessment chart shown in Figure , which included four dimensions: (1) identification and analysis of the problem, (2) interaction, (3) responsibility and commitment, and (4) presentation; each with several aspects to asses and four levels of performance to select from (Figure ). Self‐assessment should help students to think about and practice thinking‐like‐a scientist, as reported by Hendrich et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research shows that the feedback process is often as important as the data collected (Benson & DeSanto, 2016). A good feedback system integrates multiple pieces of information to enhance learning (Tee & Ahmed, 2014). Soliciting feedback from multiple sources in a large classroom will give a more accurate picture of performance and development opportunities because each rater observes different aspects of the learner’s behavior.…”
Section: Multisource Experiential Learning Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%