36 Quantifying Stress and Anxiety: Development and Validation of a Novel Fear Test for Cattle.

Mathias, A; Forehand, L.; Carstens, G. E.; Daigle, Courtney L

doi:10.1093/jas/sky027.036

Journal of Animal Science

2018

DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky027.036

|View full text |Cite

36 Quantifying Stress and Anxiety: Development and Validation of a Novel Fear Test for Cattle.

A Mathias

L. Forehand

G. E. Carstens

et al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2020

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Behavioral responses while in the BZM (SEEKING, PANIC) are presented inTable 4. Because this test is not repeatable22 …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Use of Traditional Fear Tests to Evaluate Different Emotional Circuits in Cattle

Daigle

Hubbard

Grandin

2020

JoVE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Animal temperament is complex and has implications for productivity and economic profitability. Quantifying an animal's response to differing stimuli may facilitate breeding selections and identify animals that are better suited to specific management strategies. Multiple tests have been developed to evaluate cattle temperament (e.g., exit velocity, chute score, pen score, open field test, startle test, bovine zero maze), but each of these tests evaluates the animal's response to different stimuli (e.g., isolation, novel environment, startle, willingness to enter an enclosed area). Cattle temperament has been observed to be relatively stable over time. However, the evaluation of temperament has the potential to be influenced by current conditions, previous experiences, and observer bias. Many of these temperament tests have been improperly categorized as fear tests and have also been criticized for being subjective. This paper provides a framework for standardizing behavioral tests for cattle and suggests that these different evaluations assess different aspects of the animal's overall temperament.

show abstract

“…Behavioral responses while in the BZM (SEEKING, PANIC) are presented inTable 4. Because this test is not repeatable22 …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Use of Traditional Fear Tests to Evaluate Different Emotional Circuits in Cattle

Daigle

Hubbard

Grandin

2020

JoVE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

36 Quantifying Stress and Anxiety: Development and Validation of a Novel Fear Test for Cattle.

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

The Use of Traditional Fear Tests to Evaluate Different Emotional Circuits in Cattle

The Use of Traditional Fear Tests to Evaluate Different Emotional Circuits in Cattle

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About