2005
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(05)81014-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

36 Dosimetry with MOSFETs in Endovascular Brachytherapy with beta sources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides the change of the dose rate with increasing SSD, effects such as an increase of scattering and a change in the energy spectrum of the electrons can occur. We proved that the microMOSFET shows less than ±5% energy dependence in the energy range from 1 to 15 MeV as stated by the manufacturer (Drud et al 2005). The energy dependence of the Roos chamber is only influenced by the stopping power correction (according to the manufacturer's data sheet).…”
Section: Dose Rate Dependence In a 12 Mev Electron Beamsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Besides the change of the dose rate with increasing SSD, effects such as an increase of scattering and a change in the energy spectrum of the electrons can occur. We proved that the microMOSFET shows less than ±5% energy dependence in the energy range from 1 to 15 MeV as stated by the manufacturer (Drud et al 2005). The energy dependence of the Roos chamber is only influenced by the stopping power correction (according to the manufacturer's data sheet).…”
Section: Dose Rate Dependence In a 12 Mev Electron Beamsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…While dose evaluations by computer simulation and by using dedicated phantoms are commonly employed in most cases, in vivo dose monitoring is not routinely performed in diagnostic techniques. Till now, Mosfets, thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD), diodes, and in some cases, electronic portal imaging devices (EPID) are commonly employed in therapy techniques [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Many drawbacks are known for these devices, particularly for radiotherapy applications: Mosfets suffer of low reproducibility and low radiation hardness; radiation hardness of diodes also appears to be poor; TLD have a low reproducibility and dose assessment is strongly delayed in time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many drawbacks are known for these devices, particularly for radiotherapy applications: Mosfets suffer of low reproducibility and low radiation hardness; radiation hardness of diodes also appears to be poor; TLD have a low reproducibility and dose assessment is strongly delayed in time. Moreover, due to their macroscopic dimensions, such dosimeters generally do not allow the direct in vivo determination of the dose imparted to inner organs, although very recent studies seem to open the perspective of the use of Mosfets in brachytherapy and in intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) of oropharynx and nasopharynx [8][9][10]. Finally, except for diodes, dosimeters nowadays do not allow a direct "real time" dose evaluation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%