2021
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.669934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmarking the Extent and Speed of Reperfusion: First Pass TICI 2c-3 Is a Preferred Endovascular Reperfusion Endpoint

Abstract: Background and Purpose: End-of-procedure substantial reperfusion [modified Treatment in Cerebral Ischemia (mTICI) 2b-3], the leading endpoint for thrombectomy studies, has several limitations including a ceiling effect, with recent achieved rates of ~90%. We aimed to identify a more optimal definition of angiographic success along two dimensions: (1) the extent of tissue reperfusion, and (2) the speed of revascularization.Methods: Core-lab adjudicated TICI scores for the first three passes of EmboTrap and the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(29 reference statements)
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In patients presenting with AIS secondary to LVOs, timely MT is the mainstay treatment in achieving recanalization. While it is recognized that mTICI 2c/3 patients have improved outcomes over mTICI 2b patients [ 7 , 8 , 9 ], little is known about what factors drive this difference in recanalization. Our study aimed to shed light on this topic by examining whether any baseline characteristics or procedural parameters were predictive of patients achieving mTICI 2c/3 over 2b following endovascular treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In patients presenting with AIS secondary to LVOs, timely MT is the mainstay treatment in achieving recanalization. While it is recognized that mTICI 2c/3 patients have improved outcomes over mTICI 2b patients [ 7 , 8 , 9 ], little is known about what factors drive this difference in recanalization. Our study aimed to shed light on this topic by examining whether any baseline characteristics or procedural parameters were predictive of patients achieving mTICI 2c/3 over 2b following endovascular treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, patients were considered to be successfully recanalized if they achieved a modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) grade of 2b, 2c, or 3. However, more recent studies have shown that patients who achieve an mTICI grade of 2c/3—considered excellent recanalization—have better outcomes than those who achieve an mTICI grade of 2b [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ]. Is it therefore of growing interest to better understand which factors separate patients who achieve excellent recanalization from those who only achieve mTICI 2b.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twelve studies comprising 3891 patients provided per pass successful recanalization rate, [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] while six studies including 1302 patients had data on per pass complete recanalization. 7,9,11,15,17,18 All studies were assessed as having a moderate risk of bias based on their non-randomized design. No studies were excluded for high-risk of bias.…”
Section: Literature Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last five years, the evidence for the efficacy and safety of endovascular therapy in patients with stroke related to large vessel occlusion (LVO) has been growing. Recanalisation resulting from mechanical thrombectomy has been observed in up to 92% of patients, although only 46% of those were fully independent three months later [1,2]. The main cause of failure is arterial reocclusion despite a previous successful angiographic result directly following an instrumental restoration of arterial patency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%