2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2021.100625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex differences in cancer risk and outcomes after kidney transplantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To prevent rejection and recurrence of autoimmunity, potent systemic immunosuppression with a combination of T cell ablation, co-stimulation blockade, calcineurin inhibitors, and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors is required [12]. However, chronic immunosuppressive therapy is associated with life-threatening adverse effects such as opportunistic infection, organ toxicity, and neoplasm development [14,15].…”
Section: Micro-and Macroencapsulation Technologies Open New Doors For...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prevent rejection and recurrence of autoimmunity, potent systemic immunosuppression with a combination of T cell ablation, co-stimulation blockade, calcineurin inhibitors, and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors is required [12]. However, chronic immunosuppressive therapy is associated with life-threatening adverse effects such as opportunistic infection, organ toxicity, and neoplasm development [14,15].…”
Section: Micro-and Macroencapsulation Technologies Open New Doors For...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in sensitivity analyses, we investigated the effects of the continuous factor eGFRcys/eGFRcr on renal prognosis in different sexes separately, and only in women the ratio had a meaningful prognostic value. As sex differences existed in many situations such as cancer risk [ 37 ] and cardiovascular complications [ 38 ] and molecular pathways mediating sex difference in response to kidney injury has been reported [ 39 ], it was reasonable that sex difference was not only due to inappropriate selection of cut-off value, but more likely resulted from greater vulnerability to various accumulated substances of SPS in women than in men.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ideal validation cohort consists of melanoma patients with paired samples before and after metastasis, and the transcriptomes are profiled by RNA-seq technology. A minimum requirement is a cohort of gender- and race-matched patients with metastatic and non-metastatic melanoma, considering the gender- [ 71 , 72 ] and racial disparities [ 73 ]. We only found an array-based transcriptomic dataset of metastatic melanoma to validate our method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%