2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Birth month and infant gross motor development: Results from the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS)

Abstract: The association between birth month and neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders has been investigated in a number of previous studies; however, the results have been inconsistent. This study investigated the association between birth month and child gross motor development at 6 and 12 months of age in a large cohort of infants (n = 72,203) participating in the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS). Gross motor development was assessed using the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ-3). At 6 months and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(57 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 and 4, the correlation starts to weaken when we enter the late preterm range. We believe this further strengthens the evidence for the role of the critical development period in homeostatic control or gross development, especially if we take into account observations of delayed development of motor skills after the "Back to Sleep" campaign [15] or association of gross development rate with birth month [16].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…3 and 4, the correlation starts to weaken when we enter the late preterm range. We believe this further strengthens the evidence for the role of the critical development period in homeostatic control or gross development, especially if we take into account observations of delayed development of motor skills after the "Back to Sleep" campaign [15] or association of gross development rate with birth month [16].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…However, as Guntheroth and Spiers point out, brainstem development theory would imply more deaths at neonatal stage than at the age of 1-6 months (SIDS peak), as neonatal stage is more "unstable" physiologically [23]. Other hypotheses related to cardiac control [24], chronic hypoxia [25], or critical diaphragm failure [26] seem to be underexplored. The uniqueness of SIDS in terms of the role of development is still a mystery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%