2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

VAD-MM/GBSA: A Variable Atomic Dielectric MM/GBSA Model for Improved Accuracy in Protein–Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations

Abstract: The molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area (MM/GBSA) has been widely used in end-point binding free energy prediction in structure-based drug design (SBDD). However, in practice, it is usually being treated as a disputed method mostly because of its system dependence. Here, combining with machine-learning optimization, we developed a novel version of MM/GBSA, named variable atomic dielectric MM/GBSA (VAD-MM/GBSA), by assigning variable dielectric constants directly to the protein/ligand atoms. The n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pharmacokinetic and toxicological properties provide crucial information on the functioning of drug molecules inside the human body [ 38 ]. In this research article, the apigenin-7- O -glucoside alpha-amylase and alpha-glucosidase complexes’ pharmacokinetic and toxicological properties were calculated from ADMET analysis using SwissADME and QikProp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pharmacokinetic and toxicological properties provide crucial information on the functioning of drug molecules inside the human body [ 38 ]. In this research article, the apigenin-7- O -glucoside alpha-amylase and alpha-glucosidase complexes’ pharmacokinetic and toxicological properties were calculated from ADMET analysis using SwissADME and QikProp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How to choose an appropriate dielectric constant is usually a vital issue in the end-point binding free energy calculations since it may significantly affect the prediction accuracy. Notably, different types of systems may exhibit different tendencies to the employed dielectric constant [38,[50][51][52][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62], such as a higher dielectric constant (i.e. ε in = 4) may be a good choice for the protein-ligand systems [51,52,[63][64][65], while a medium dielectric constant (i.e.…”
Section: Impact Of the Dielectric Constantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scoring functions (SFs) however have much lower computational costs and have found wide application in the prediction of binding affinity in protein–ligand complexes . Classical SFs can be force field-based, , empirical, or knowledge-based. , Force field-based SFs are usually based on calculated energies, while empirical SFs are based on a hypothetical equation with linear regression (LR) parameters. In knowledge-based SFs, the energy terms are derived from the statistics of protein–ligand interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%