2021
DOI: 10.1111/mec.15989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An overview of current population genomics methods for the analysis of whole‐genome resequencing data in eukaryotes

Abstract: Comprehensive analyses of species history and selection contribute to our understanding of causation in biology, an effort that has included genetics, developmental science and ecology (Laland et al., 2011). The number of population genomic studies aimed at elucidating the history of natural populations has increased enormously in the last 10 years. A few examples include an improved understanding of the history of human migrations, admixture and adaptation (e.g.,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 299 publications
(210 reference statements)
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the number of SNPs obtained and the ability to detect genes underlying local adaptation from the abovementioned methods may be influenced due to the differences in library preparation, SNP densities, and the bioinformatics parameters applied to SNP filtering ( Hoban et al, 2016 ; Lowry et al, 2017 ; McKinney et al, 2017 ). As more and more forest tree genomes have been published (e.g., Table 1 in Ingvarsson et al, 2016 ) and sequencing costs fall, whole-genome resequencing is thriving and becoming an option for landscape genomics studies ( Lin et al, 2018 ; Zhu et al, 2020 ), which can provide unprecedented marker density and determine other genetic variation such as structural variants and mutations in regulatory elements, increasing power for the detection of local adaptation and providing novel insights into the role of selection, recombination, and gene flow in promoting or impairing local adaptation to new habitats compared with reduced-representation methods ( Fuentes-Pardo and Ruzzante, 2017 ; Bourgeois and Warren, 2021 ). In addition, the degrees of linkage disequilibrium (LD) in the studied species will also influence the power of detecting adaptive SNPs.…”
Section: Challenges and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the number of SNPs obtained and the ability to detect genes underlying local adaptation from the abovementioned methods may be influenced due to the differences in library preparation, SNP densities, and the bioinformatics parameters applied to SNP filtering ( Hoban et al, 2016 ; Lowry et al, 2017 ; McKinney et al, 2017 ). As more and more forest tree genomes have been published (e.g., Table 1 in Ingvarsson et al, 2016 ) and sequencing costs fall, whole-genome resequencing is thriving and becoming an option for landscape genomics studies ( Lin et al, 2018 ; Zhu et al, 2020 ), which can provide unprecedented marker density and determine other genetic variation such as structural variants and mutations in regulatory elements, increasing power for the detection of local adaptation and providing novel insights into the role of selection, recombination, and gene flow in promoting or impairing local adaptation to new habitats compared with reduced-representation methods ( Fuentes-Pardo and Ruzzante, 2017 ; Bourgeois and Warren, 2021 ). In addition, the degrees of linkage disequilibrium (LD) in the studied species will also influence the power of detecting adaptive SNPs.…”
Section: Challenges and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These genomic measures can be used to accurately estimate distinct genetic areas and assess inbreeding in populations, they have been used to design breeding schemes to select against deleterious alleles or to increase heterozygosity, and they have the potential to increase the long-term survival of breeds and wild populations in view of climate change (for an overview see . For evaluating overall adaptive potential whole genome, or at least genome-wide screenings, may remain the preferred option (Flanagan et al 2018;Bourgeois and Warren 2021).…”
Section: How Can Genomic Information Help?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional articles that compare WGS to the in‐vogue methods of reduced representation libraries (RRL), genotyping by sequencing (GBS) and restriction site associated DNA sequencing (RADseq) provide convincing evidence for the superiority of WGS in many regards (Duntsch et al, 2021; Lou et al, 2021; Szarmach et al, 2021), while others use WGS to address previously insurmountable challenges (Vekemans et al, 2021; Yoder & Tiley, 2021). Many of the manuscripts in this special issue provide methodological resources that will undoubtedly serve our community for years to come, including bioinformatics pipelines (Lou et al, 2021; Ribeiro et al, 2021) and a compendium of tools for WGS data analysis (Bourgeois & Warren, 2021). A second theme within the special issue is that of empirical studies using WGS to infer demographic dynamics across evolutionary timescales.…”
Section: Highlights Of 2021mentioning
confidence: 99%