2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.04.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased attention allocation to socially threatening faces in social anxiety disorder: A replication study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, prior studies (Lazarov et al, 2016(Lazarov et al, , 2021 found that when participants freely gaze at the matrices used in GCMRT, but without music playing, the percentage of time spent dwelling on threatening versus neutral faces is higher in adults with SAD than in controls and this metric shows excellent internal consistency. Indeed, Lazarov et al (2021) reported a Cronbach's alpha of .99 for this measure in adults with SAD and a sample of community controls, with a two-week retest reliability of r(20) = .92 in the control group; retest reliability was not assessed in the SAD group. These findings replicated earlier results obtained in adults with SAD, students with subclinical social anxiety, and students with minimal anxiety (Lazarov et al, 2016).…”
Section: Psychometricsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, prior studies (Lazarov et al, 2016(Lazarov et al, , 2021 found that when participants freely gaze at the matrices used in GCMRT, but without music playing, the percentage of time spent dwelling on threatening versus neutral faces is higher in adults with SAD than in controls and this metric shows excellent internal consistency. Indeed, Lazarov et al (2021) reported a Cronbach's alpha of .99 for this measure in adults with SAD and a sample of community controls, with a two-week retest reliability of r(20) = .92 in the control group; retest reliability was not assessed in the SAD group. These findings replicated earlier results obtained in adults with SAD, students with subclinical social anxiety, and students with minimal anxiety (Lazarov et al, 2016).…”
Section: Psychometricsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Because GCMRT is designed to drive changes in gaze within and across sessions, an analysis of internal consistency or retest reliability would not be appropriate. However, prior studies (Lazarov et al, 2016(Lazarov et al, , 2021 found that when participants freely gaze at the matrices used in GCMRT, but without music playing, the percentage of time spent dwelling on threatening versus neutral faces is higher in adults with SAD than in controls and this metric shows excellent internal consistency. Indeed, Lazarov et al (2021) reported a Cronbach's alpha of .99 for this measure in adults with SAD and a sample of community controls, with a two-week retest reliability of r(20) = .92 in the control group; retest reliability was not assessed in the SAD group.…”
Section: Psychometricsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Additionally, new research has been conducted on the role of behavioral avoidance 22 , safety behaviors 23 , attentional bias to threatening faces 24 , gaze avoidance 25 , delays in attention disengagement from social threat 26 , rumination 27 , 28 , blushing 29 , inattention, intolerance of uncertainty 30 , and fearful attachment style 31 .…”
Section: Recent Advances In Improving the Understanding Of Sadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, interpreting ambiguous or neutral faces and voices as negative was found in patients suffering from SAD and it is also considered as a key development and maintenance factor of SAD ( 4 , 5 ). In addition, SAD patients and individuals who score high on SA assessments allocate more attention resources ( 6 , 7 ), have more solid memorization ( 8 , 9 ) to threatening faces and exhibit higher recognition accuracy for fearful and sad voices than their non-socially anxious counterparts ( 10 ). At the neural level, greater activity in response to faces and voices have been found in widely distributed networks at multiple temporal stages in SA individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%