The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.04.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does weight-based pricing for municipal waste collection contribute to waste reduction? A dynamic panel analysis in Flanders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dijkgraaf and Gradus (2004), De jaeger and Eyckmans (2015) found a significant effect for the introduction of weight-based pricing on the quantities of residual waste. Sasao et al (2021) show that the continuous participation of weight-based pricing significantly reduces waste by almost 10.4 %. Park and Lah (2015) found that volume-based waste fees had a positive influence on recycling rates.…”
Section: Pricing Unitsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Dijkgraaf and Gradus (2004), De jaeger and Eyckmans (2015) found a significant effect for the introduction of weight-based pricing on the quantities of residual waste. Sasao et al (2021) show that the continuous participation of weight-based pricing significantly reduces waste by almost 10.4 %. Park and Lah (2015) found that volume-based waste fees had a positive influence on recycling rates.…”
Section: Pricing Unitsmentioning
confidence: 98%