2021
DOI: 10.1038/s42003-021-02062-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A synthetic RNA editing factor edits its target site in chloroplasts and bacteria

Abstract: Members of the pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) protein family act as specificity factors in C-to-U RNA editing. The expansion of the PPR superfamily in plants provides the sequence variation required for design of consensus-based RNA-binding proteins. We used this approach to design a synthetic RNA editing factor to target one of the sites in the Arabidopsis chloroplast transcriptome recognised by the natural editing factor CHLOROPLAST BIOGENESIS 19 (CLB19). We show that our synthetic editing factor specificall… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
38
2
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
38
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A very recent new approach has focused on particular S-type PPRs ( 78 ) modeling the binding properties of the widely studied natural CLB19 editing factor ( 50 , 78–85 ). This work extended and complemented an earlier attempt using a synthetic PLS-type PPR array as a surrogate for the PPR array of CLB19, which, however, turned out to require MORF2, a ‘Multiple Organelle RNA editing Factor’, as a necessary co-factor for obtaining moderate RNA editing efficiency ( 86 ). Using the E. coli assay setup, the synthetic PLS-type PPR protein did not cause an off-target editing, while the artificial S-type approach resulted in 50% of RNA editing at its natural CLB19 rpoA target and only weakly affected one single off-target ( tufB ) in E. coli ( 78 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…A very recent new approach has focused on particular S-type PPRs ( 78 ) modeling the binding properties of the widely studied natural CLB19 editing factor ( 50 , 78–85 ). This work extended and complemented an earlier attempt using a synthetic PLS-type PPR array as a surrogate for the PPR array of CLB19, which, however, turned out to require MORF2, a ‘Multiple Organelle RNA editing Factor’, as a necessary co-factor for obtaining moderate RNA editing efficiency ( 86 ). Using the E. coli assay setup, the synthetic PLS-type PPR protein did not cause an off-target editing, while the artificial S-type approach resulted in 50% of RNA editing at its natural CLB19 rpoA target and only weakly affected one single off-target ( tufB ) in E. coli ( 78 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…MORF proteins are essential for effective RNA editing in angiosperms because they interact with PPR domains at the L motif and increase their affinity to target RNAs (Yan et al., 2017). RNA editing with synthetic PLS type PPR proteins in E. coli required co‐expression of MORF2 (Royan et al., 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the design of synthetic PPR‐type RNA editing factors based on consensus motifs was reported (Royan et al., 2021). This approach is very attractive in terms of developing programmable biotechnological tools to convert specific cytidines to uridines in RNA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In-silico data (Cheng et al, 2016;Harrison et al, 2016;Shen et al, 2019) indicate the preferred sequence 5'-UACCAAAAGGU for MSP1's PPR 4-11 motifs. (B) The PPRmatcher algorithm (Royan et al, 2021), which aligns the predicated PPR motifs to every possible position in the mitogenome of Arabidopsis (i.e., ~720K positions) and scores each alignment based on the data in (Yan et al, 2019).…”
Section: Data Availabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%