2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12013-021-00985-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective Drug Candidates as Human Multidrug Transporter ABCG2 Inhibitors: an In Silico Drug Discovery Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The general AMBER force field (GAFF2) was employed to parameterize NPASS compounds [ 33 ], while the ABCB1 transporter was parameterized using an AMBER force field of 14SB [ 34 ]. The minutiae of employed MD simulations are characterized in [ 35 , 36 , 37 ]. In this work, both implicit- and explicit-solvent MD simulations were executed.…”
Section: Computational Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general AMBER force field (GAFF2) was employed to parameterize NPASS compounds [ 33 ], while the ABCB1 transporter was parameterized using an AMBER force field of 14SB [ 34 ]. The minutiae of employed MD simulations are characterized in [ 35 , 36 , 37 ]. In this work, both implicit- and explicit-solvent MD simulations were executed.…”
Section: Computational Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pibrentasvir is one of the prospective drug candidates in clinical-trial or investigational stages as ABCG2 inhibitors. Pibrentasvir was proposed as a therapeutic option for multidrug-resistant cancers via targeting ABCG2 transporter based on an in silico drug discovery study [ 19 ]. Therefore, the binding affinity of pibrentasvir with ABCG2 transporter was estimated over 100 ns MD simulations and compared to NPACT00968 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While virtual screening of clinical and investigational drugs as ABCG2 inhibitors revealed that pibrentasvir, venetoclax, and ledipasvir would be promising inhibitors (calc. k i = 1.14 nM, 16.4 nM, and 8.19 pM, respectively) toward ABCG2 transporter [ 19 ]. Chemical databases were filtrated toward the ABCG2 transporter to discover prospective ABCG2 inhibitors utilizing advanced computational approaches, revealing eight potential inhibitors with binding affinities less than − 55.8 kcal/mol [ 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 The minutiae of the utilized MD simulations are explicated in ref. 40–44. In succinct, the investigated inhibitors were characterized with the aid of the General AMBER Force Field (GAFF2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%