2021
DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(21)00066-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: recommendations of the International Working Group

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
310
1
7

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 441 publications
(323 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
5
310
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a clinical interest in assessing SM in the most accurate possible way. The latest clinical diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease discourage the use of available biomarkers as the sole diagnostic features at the pre-clinical stage (Dubois et al, 2021). It is thus of central importance to explore alternative methodological routes that can help identify subtle changes indicative of early stage neurodegeneration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a clinical interest in assessing SM in the most accurate possible way. The latest clinical diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease discourage the use of available biomarkers as the sole diagnostic features at the pre-clinical stage (Dubois et al, 2021). It is thus of central importance to explore alternative methodological routes that can help identify subtle changes indicative of early stage neurodegeneration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the predicted rise of patients suffering from Alzheimer’s disease (AD) during the upcoming decades demands a reliable, fast and non-invasive diagnostics method [ 110 ]. Although diagnosing AD becomes more and more based on specific biomarkers, clinical (neuropsychological) assessments combined with magnetic resonance imaging or positron emission tomography are often required for making actual reliable diagnoses [ 111 , 112 , 113 ]. The latter methods are time-consuming, invasive and are unreliable to detect early-stage AD.…”
Section: Application Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the routine medical practice—based mostly on clinical and neuropsychological assessments in vivo—makes it possible to diagnose merely probable or possible AD [ 14 ]. Attempts have been made in the last few years to get to an in vivo neuropathological diagnosis of the disease, independent from the clinical symptoms [ 15 ]; however, the latest recommendation is to opt of a comprehensive approach, encompassing both the clinical assessment and in vivo neuropathological evaluation [ 16 ]. The goal is to diagnose AD as early as possible, in the prodromal phase (Mild Cognitive Impairment), when patients harbor pre-symptomatic pathological changes but maintain good brain functionality, in order to make use of treatments able to counteract or delay the appearance of symptoms [ 17 ].…”
Section: Alzheimer’s Disease and The Quest For Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 99%