2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil invertebrate toxicity and bioaccumulation of nano copper oxide and copper sulphate in soils, with and without biosolids amendment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From these measured endpoints we derived population level effects for exposure to both Cu forms. Both Cu forms caused negative effects on the different stages, as in agreement with previous results ( Heckmann et al, 2011 , Velicogna et al, 2021 ). The results provide additional information to the standard OECD test, showing that Cu exerted its effect on juvenile mortality and cocoon production – which is not seen in the standard OECD test.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…From these measured endpoints we derived population level effects for exposure to both Cu forms. Both Cu forms caused negative effects on the different stages, as in agreement with previous results ( Heckmann et al, 2011 , Velicogna et al, 2021 ). The results provide additional information to the standard OECD test, showing that Cu exerted its effect on juvenile mortality and cocoon production – which is not seen in the standard OECD test.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our results show that the addition of CuSO 4 in combinations with HCl and starch produced high values of colonization, but they were not higher than those achieved by the application of HCl alone ( Table 2 ). Considering the environmental toxicity of CuSO 4 [ 32 ], we recommend using hydrochloric acid as a treatment option.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At 3 mg Cu/kg, all endpoints were approximately 40% lower than the control and the overall significant difference was most pronounced, while no significant effect was visible anymore at 32 mg Cu/kg (Figure 5). The CuO‐NPs tend to agglomerate in soils with increasing NP concentration (Velicogna et al, 2021), with a distinct increase in CuO‐NP particle size from 15 to 50 mg/kg, indicating an enhanced agglomeration (Fischer et al, 2021a). This might explain why toxic effects in M30 soil did not occur anymore at 32 mg/kg.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, reproduction rates in the M30 soil corroborate the observation that, in contrast to CuCl 2 , CuO‐NP can negatively impact F. candida in clay‐rich soils in a nonlinear dose–response relationship (Fischer et al, 2021a) at field‐realistic test concentrations that are considered to be in the range of 0.5–20 mg Cu/kg (calculated fresh Cu input within one to five seasons [Fischer et al, 2021a]) or one season of application (Peixoto et al, 2021). The reason for this nonlinear dose–response relationship may be that the stronger agglomeration behavior of CuO‐NPs at test concentrations ≥50 mg Cu/kg (Fischer et al, 2021a; Velicogna et al, 2021) reduces their reactive surfaces. This may also explain why no toxic effects on soil invertebrates are typically observed at much higher concentrations of CuO‐NP (summarized by Fischer et al, 2021a) or other metal‐based NPs in the range of 1000–6400 mg/kg (Heckmann et al, 2011; Noordhoek et al, 2018; Pereira et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation