2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.04.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HepQuant SHUNT Detects Portal Hypertension in Early Stages of Clinically Compensated Chronic Liver Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Noninvasive fibrous diagnoses are evolving rapidly. [79][80][81][82] The broad classes of noninvasive assessment tools include (1) serum assays, using either standard laboratory tests (e.g., Fibrosis-4), proprietary assays for matrix components (e.g., enhanced liver fibrosis, [83] N-terminal type III collagen propeptide [ProC3]/ProC5), proteomics, [84] lipidomics, [85] microRNAs, [86,87] and components of the microbiome [88] ; (2) imaging tests (CT, MRI, or positron emission tomography) that can quantify liver fat, inflammation, fibrosis, as well as liver stiffness as a surrogate for matrix content (reviewed in Besutti et al [89] and Ajmena and Loomba [90] )-techniques for image collagen content directly using collagen-specific probes are also under development [91] -(3) microbiome assessment because the pattern and diversity of the microbiome evolve with disease progression for bacteria, viruses, and fungi [92][93][94][95] ; and (4) functional tests, which measure either intrahepatic shunting, [96] microsomal activity, [97,98] or proteolytic activity in either liver or circulation. [99] Despite the substantial progress and significant investment in developing noninvasive markers of hepatic fibrosis, none has yet been able to supplant biopsy.…”
Section: Noninvasi Ve Assessment Of Hepatic Fibrosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noninvasive fibrous diagnoses are evolving rapidly. [79][80][81][82] The broad classes of noninvasive assessment tools include (1) serum assays, using either standard laboratory tests (e.g., Fibrosis-4), proprietary assays for matrix components (e.g., enhanced liver fibrosis, [83] N-terminal type III collagen propeptide [ProC3]/ProC5), proteomics, [84] lipidomics, [85] microRNAs, [86,87] and components of the microbiome [88] ; (2) imaging tests (CT, MRI, or positron emission tomography) that can quantify liver fat, inflammation, fibrosis, as well as liver stiffness as a surrogate for matrix content (reviewed in Besutti et al [89] and Ajmena and Loomba [90] )-techniques for image collagen content directly using collagen-specific probes are also under development [91] -(3) microbiome assessment because the pattern and diversity of the microbiome evolve with disease progression for bacteria, viruses, and fungi [92][93][94][95] ; and (4) functional tests, which measure either intrahepatic shunting, [96] microsomal activity, [97,98] or proteolytic activity in either liver or circulation. [99] Despite the substantial progress and significant investment in developing noninvasive markers of hepatic fibrosis, none has yet been able to supplant biopsy.…”
Section: Noninvasi Ve Assessment Of Hepatic Fibrosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 26 This test is also capable of the early, noninvasive detection of PH, with a reliability similar to that of HVPG. 27 However, while HVPG remains the gold standard method for assessing PH, and its use is encouraged in clinical trials, it is invasive and requires considerable resources and expertise. 28 Therefore, HepQuant SHUNT and other noninvasive biomarkers (eg, spleen stiffness measurements 28 ) may complement HVPG in the short term and perhaps replace it in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The more recent HepQuant SHUNT trial has used double clearance of cholates after oral and intravenous administration to quantify hepatic perfusion without the effects of total plasma volume. A study ( 29 ) of early clinical compensatory chronic liver disease in 42 patients found that patients with portal hypertension had lower portal hepatic filtration rates and higher portal-systemic spillover of oral d4-cholate percentage (SHUNT%), which presented the increasing portal-systemic flow and the decreasing intrahepatic flow. When evaluated CSPH, using HVPG > 10 mmHg or direct portal pressure (dPP) > 22 mmHg as gold standards, the sensitivity and specificity of SHUNT% > 0.35 was 76.9 and 89.6%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The injury of liver parenchyma was the feature of liver fibrosis, related liver function indices including single platelet count (PLT), aspartate aminotransferase to alanine aminotransferase (AAR) ratio, aspartate aminotransferase to platelet count ratio index (APRI), fibrosis index based on 4 factors (FIB-4 consists of PLT, AST, ALT, and age), glutamyl transpeptidase to platelet (GPR), King's score (consists of Age, AST, INR, and PLT), Lok score (consists of PLT, AST, ALT, and INR), and the CSPH risk score (consists of ALB, INR, and ALT) have been validated to evaluate PH. Using HVPG ≥ 10 mmHg as the golden standard, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the above indices to diagnose CSPH was 0.6-0.8 and hardly exceeds 0.8 (27)(28)(29).…”
Section: Blood Test the Indicators Of Liver Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%