2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.04.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short Communication: Interim toxicity analysis for patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer (LSCLC) treated on CALGB 30610 (Alliance) / RTOG 0538

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Between March 15, 2008, and December 1, 2019, 731 patients were randomly assigned (Fig 1). A planned interim toxicity analysis resulted in discontinuation of the 61.2-Gy concomitant-boost arm in March 2013, 10 leaving 638 patients randomly assigned to 45-Gy twice-daily radiotherapy (n = 313) or 70-Gy once-daily radiotherapy (n = 325) for primary analysis. The distributions of the baseline covariates were comparable between study (Table 1), and treatment details were similar in both cohorts (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between March 15, 2008, and December 1, 2019, 731 patients were randomly assigned (Fig 1). A planned interim toxicity analysis resulted in discontinuation of the 61.2-Gy concomitant-boost arm in March 2013, 10 leaving 638 patients randomly assigned to 45-Gy twice-daily radiotherapy (n = 313) or 70-Gy once-daily radiotherapy (n = 325) for primary analysis. The distributions of the baseline covariates were comparable between study (Table 1), and treatment details were similar in both cohorts (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients were randomized to 45 Gy BID or 70 Gy QD in the CALGB 30610/RTOG 0538 phase III trial; however, the 61.2 Gy concomitant boost arm was terminated early after the interim analysis due to unfavorable toxicity compared with 70 Gy [ 18 ]. Subsequently, no direct comparison was made between the doses of 61.2 Gy and 70 Gy [ 5 , 19 ]. Therefore, our study is an important academic data as one of the few studies to compare QD doses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although TNM staging is prognostic, in clinical practice, the Veterans Administration Lung Study Group classification is most used to guide decision making for initial treatment for patients with LS-SCLC. 67 The treatment regimen for LS-SCLC has remained the same with the standard of care therapy consisting of four cycles of PE concurrent with TRT given once or twice daily, with 5-year OS of approximately 25% to 30% [68][69][70][71] Despite multiple studies, there has not been significant gain in survival with lower dose, twice-daily, and high-dose once-daily concurrent chemoradiotherapy. 72 Increased lung cancer screening may identify earlier stage SCLC, and, if found early enough, surgery followed by adjuvant PE is recommended.…”
Section: Limited-stage Sclcmentioning
confidence: 99%