2021
DOI: 10.1007/s13744-021-00871-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two New Cyphoderus Nicolet (Collembola: Paronellidae) of the “bidenticulati-group” with Dental Plurichaetosis from Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Homology. The terminology used in the diagnoses for the hypotheses of homology followed: labial chaetotaxy after Gisin [29] with additions of Zhang & Pan [30]; Fjellberg [31] for labial palp papillae and maxillary palp; postlabial chaetotaxy after Chen & Christiansen [32], with adaptations of Cipola et al [33] for J series; clypeal chaetotaxy after Yoshii & Suhardjono [34]; labral chaetotaxy after Cipola et al [35]; unguiculus lamellae after Hüther [36]; Anterior dens chaetotaxy after Oliveira et al [37]; Mari-Mutt [38] for dorsal head chaetotaxy, with additions of Soto-Adames [39]; Szeptycki [40] and Zhang & Deharveng [41] for S-chaetotaxy; and Szeptycki [42] for dorsal chaetotaxy, with additions and modifications provided by Soto-Adames [39] and Zhang et al [43]. Symbols used to depict the chaetotaxy are presented in Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Homology. The terminology used in the diagnoses for the hypotheses of homology followed: labial chaetotaxy after Gisin [29] with additions of Zhang & Pan [30]; Fjellberg [31] for labial palp papillae and maxillary palp; postlabial chaetotaxy after Chen & Christiansen [32], with adaptations of Cipola et al [33] for J series; clypeal chaetotaxy after Yoshii & Suhardjono [34]; labral chaetotaxy after Cipola et al [35]; unguiculus lamellae after Hüther [36]; Anterior dens chaetotaxy after Oliveira et al [37]; Mari-Mutt [38] for dorsal head chaetotaxy, with additions of Soto-Adames [39]; Szeptycki [40] and Zhang & Deharveng [41] for S-chaetotaxy; and Szeptycki [42] for dorsal chaetotaxy, with additions and modifications provided by Soto-Adames [39] and Zhang et al [43]. Symbols used to depict the chaetotaxy are presented in Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cave fauna of Brazilian springtails is mainly represented by species of Acherontides Bonet, 1945 [ 6 ] (Poduromorpha); Cyphoderus Nicolet, 1842 [ 7 ], Troglobius Palacios-Vargas and Wilson, 1990 [ 8 ], Trogolaphysa Mills, 1938 [ 9 ], Pseudosinella Schäffer, 1897 [ 10 ], Coecobrya Yosii, 1956 [ 11 ] (Entomobryomorpha); Arrhopalites Börner, 1906 [ 12 ], Pararrhopalites Bonet and Tellez, 1947 [ 13 ] and Keratosminthurus (Symphypleona), summing up more than 40 species [ 2 , 4 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ]. Although many recent efforts aimed to describe the Brazilian cave fauna of Collembola, as in [ 4 , 15 , 16 , 18 , 19 , 21 ], it is noteworthy that most subterranean ecosystems in the country are undersampled for invertebrates in general (including the springtails fauna), especially in the semiarid landscapes. On the other hand, preliminary data supports that the Caatinga, a unique semiarid domain only found in Brazil, can host complex cave systems which shelter a high number of troglomorphic endemic invertebrates, many of them potentially troglobitic [ 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%