2021
DOI: 10.1249/mss.0000000000002682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Musculoskeletal Responses to Exercise Plus Nutrition in Men with Prostate Cancer on Androgen Deprivation: A 12-Month RCT

Abstract: Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise ® Published ahead of Print contains articles in unedited manuscript form that have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication. This manuscript will undergo copyediting, page composition, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered that could affect the content.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Low muscle mass is associated with greater risk for cognitive decline, particularly when combined with low strength 40. Contrary to our hypotheses and reported in detail elsewhere,18 the multicomponent exercise training and nutritional supplementation intervention in our study had limited effects to strength and function and did not elicit any significant between-group improvements in lean mass or muscle cross-sectional area compared with usual care 18. Reasons may include that the intervention group patients within our study tended to have sufficient dietary protein intake (~1.1 g/kg/day; online supplemental table S3), which is close to the recommended intake of at least 1.20 g/kg/day for older adults when undertaking resistance training 41.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Low muscle mass is associated with greater risk for cognitive decline, particularly when combined with low strength 40. Contrary to our hypotheses and reported in detail elsewhere,18 the multicomponent exercise training and nutritional supplementation intervention in our study had limited effects to strength and function and did not elicit any significant between-group improvements in lean mass or muscle cross-sectional area compared with usual care 18. Reasons may include that the intervention group patients within our study tended to have sufficient dietary protein intake (~1.1 g/kg/day; online supplemental table S3), which is close to the recommended intake of at least 1.20 g/kg/day for older adults when undertaking resistance training 41.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…As reported in detail elsewhere,18 there were no significant within-group changes or between-group differences for daily energy, carbohydrate, protein or fat intake (excluding the supplements; online supplemental table S3). Mean (95% CI) habitual physical activity increased within the control group at 12-month follow-up (453 (70, 835) kJ/day, p=0.040), yet there were no other within-group changes or between-group differences observed at any other time-point (online supplemental table S3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations