2021
DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2021.1916750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-effectiveness of opicapone and entacapone in reducing OFF-time in Parkinson’s disease patients treated with levodopa/carbidopa

Abstract: Cost-effectiveness outcomes included incremental cost per OFF-time hours avoided, cost per life year gained, and cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Outcomes were projected over a 25-year lifetime horizon and discounted at 3% annually.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, since only one head-to-head comparison study of opicapone and entacapone (BIPARK-1) has been conducted [ 8 ], further studies on the efficacy and safety of several COMT inhibitors are required. According to a cost-effectiveness simulation study comparing opicapone with entacapone, opicapone was more effective in reducing off-time than entacapone and had a 60–65% probability of being cost-effective [ 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since only one head-to-head comparison study of opicapone and entacapone (BIPARK-1) has been conducted [ 8 ], further studies on the efficacy and safety of several COMT inhibitors are required. According to a cost-effectiveness simulation study comparing opicapone with entacapone, opicapone was more effective in reducing off-time than entacapone and had a 60–65% probability of being cost-effective [ 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the affinity of the compounds under study with each of the chosen targets, a comparison was made with the PDB ligand and positive control (a drug already used with activity at the targets reported in the literature). The positive controls used were respectively: L-DOPA (α-synuclein) [ 154 ], Pramipexole (D2 Dopamine Receptor) [ 155 ], Bromocriptine (D1 Dopamine Receptor) [ 156 ], Istradefylline (Adenosine A2A Receptor) [ 157 ], Entacapone (COMT Catechol O-methyltransferase) [ 158 ], and Rasagiline (Monoamine Oxidase MAO) [ 95 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%