2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-87669-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The efficacy of CRISPR-mediated cytosine base editing with the RPS5a promoter in Arabidopsis thaliana

Abstract: CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing is an important and versatile technology in modern biological research. Recent advancements include base-editing CRISPR tools that enable targeted nucleotide substitutions using a fusion protein comprising a nickase variant of Cas9 and a base deaminase. Improvements in base editing efficiencies and inheritable of edited loci need to be made to make CRISPR a viable system in plants. Here, we report efficiency of cytosine base editors (CBEs) in Arabidopsis thaliana by applying… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some advantages to our strategy, i.e., using a single gRNA to target two genes, include faster preparation of mutant lines compared with obtaining different allelic mutant lines by crossing between single mutant lines and reduced the complexity of gRNA design compared with using multiple gRNAs. The efficiencies of various promoters used for Cas9 expression during CRISPR-mediated genome editing have been assessed [ 27 , 28 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 ]. Using more efficient promoters, such as RPS5a, may enhance mutation rates in the T 1 generation, thus increasing the chance of obtaining more inherited mutations in the T 2 generation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some advantages to our strategy, i.e., using a single gRNA to target two genes, include faster preparation of mutant lines compared with obtaining different allelic mutant lines by crossing between single mutant lines and reduced the complexity of gRNA design compared with using multiple gRNAs. The efficiencies of various promoters used for Cas9 expression during CRISPR-mediated genome editing have been assessed [ 27 , 28 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 ]. Using more efficient promoters, such as RPS5a, may enhance mutation rates in the T 1 generation, thus increasing the chance of obtaining more inherited mutations in the T 2 generation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the prime editor can edit near or far from PAM sites making it less constrained by PAM availability in the target genome in the same way as other CRISPR-based methods. Overall, these new precise nucleotide-editing strategies could further expand the CRISPR-based applications for the development of novel quantitative traits with a gain-of-function mutation [184,185]. In addition to its numerous advantages over conventional CRISPR-based systems, there are still certain aspects (e.g., on-target editing efficiency, unwanted mutations, optimal experiment design [186]) that need to be improved further for a more efficient and robust genome editing application.…”
Section: Development Of Highly Efficient and Precision Genome Editing...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NGS output files were further processed using a modified python script (Choi et al 2021). The files of the NGS data generated after processing can be found in Supplemental Dataset 1.…”
Section: Genotyping By Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%