2021
DOI: 10.1080/00207454.2021.1912039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developmental characteristics of visual evoked potentials to different stimulation in normal children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The few EEG N1 studies have observed a response between 2-6 months (Hammarrenger et al,2003;Morrone et al,1996;Taylor & McCulloch,1992). Whereas some EEG studies report no age-related P1 amplitude change in response to pattern reversal stimuli (Jiang et al,2023;Lenassi et al,2008), other studies report a gradual increase in P1 amplitude until ∼2 years old (Kos-Pietro et al,1997), and some a maximum P1 amplitude around 2-6 months of age (Crognale et al,1993; Hammarrenger et al,2003; Jensen et al,2019; Lippé et al,2007). The inconsistent P1 amplitude findings are likely due, in part, to the fact that some studies measure P1 amplitude as a baseline-to-peak measure (Hammarrenger et al,2003;Lippé et al,2007;Tremblay et al,2014) and some P1 amplitude from the peak of the previous N1 (Crognale et al,1993;Jensen et al,2019;Odom et al,2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The few EEG N1 studies have observed a response between 2-6 months (Hammarrenger et al,2003;Morrone et al,1996;Taylor & McCulloch,1992). Whereas some EEG studies report no age-related P1 amplitude change in response to pattern reversal stimuli (Jiang et al,2023;Lenassi et al,2008), other studies report a gradual increase in P1 amplitude until ∼2 years old (Kos-Pietro et al,1997), and some a maximum P1 amplitude around 2-6 months of age (Crognale et al,1993; Hammarrenger et al,2003; Jensen et al,2019; Lippé et al,2007). The inconsistent P1 amplitude findings are likely due, in part, to the fact that some studies measure P1 amplitude as a baseline-to-peak measure (Hammarrenger et al,2003;Lippé et al,2007;Tremblay et al,2014) and some P1 amplitude from the peak of the previous N1 (Crognale et al,1993;Jensen et al,2019;Odom et al,2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 The different components of VEP are disturbed in different disorders for example latency of VEP is prolonged in demyelinating diseases of the visual pathway and the amplitude is reduced in the axonal damage. 9,10 The rationale of study is to prevent the misinterpretation of the VEP results for ocular pathologies in the more prevalent myopia individuals. Present study determine effects of myopia on Visual Evoked Potentials in subjects attending tertiary care eye hospital.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%