Measuring fidelity to delivery of a new smoking cessation intervention integrated into routine tuberculosis care in Pakistan and Bangladesh: Contextual differences and opportunities

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Tobacco smoking among tuberculosis (TB) patients leads to poorer treatment outcomes. Smoking cessation support should be integrated into routine TB care. We measured healthcare providers’ fidelity to a smoking cessation intervention integrated into routine TB care, in Bangladesh and Pakistan. We aimed to understand the role of providers and settings in the implementation of behavior support (BS) messages for TB and smoking cessation. METHODS The integrated BS intervention was implemented in TB clinics (24 public and 1 private). Cross-sectional data were collected on the fidelity of delivery of the BS intervention using a predefined fidelity index based on an existing validated method of measuring intervention fidelity. Audio-recordings of patient-provider BS sessions were coded using the fidelity index. Intervention fidelity was presented as the proportion of sessions that implemented BS messages. RESULTS A total of 96 sessions were conducted, 37 in Bangladesh and 59 in Pakistan. In public settings, TB medication advice was offered in 91.9% (95% CI: 78.7– 97.2) of sessions in Bangladesh, and in 75.5% (95% CI: 62.4–85.1) of sessions in Pakistan; whilst it was offered in 83.3% (95% CI: 43.7–97.0) of sessions in the private setting in Pakistan. Patients’ smoking status was assessed in 70.3% (95% CI: 54.2–82.5) of sessions in Bangladesh, and in 34.0% (95% CI: 22.7–47.4) of sessions in the public setting and in 66.7% (95% CI: 30.0–90.3) of sessions in the private setting in Pakistan. A quit date was set in 32.4% (95% CI: 19.6–48.5) of all sessions in Bangladesh, and in 33.3% (95% CI: 9.6–70.0) of all sessions in the public setting in Pakistan. CONCLUSIONS Fidelity to the intended delivery of the intervention was found to be high for TB-related messages but not for smoking cessation messages. Clinic contexts may play a mediating role in health workers’ opportunities to deliver the intervention as planned. TRIAL REGISTRATION International Standard Randomized Clinical Trial Number (ISRCTN43811467). Registered 23 March 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN43811467

Cost-utility of cytisine for smoking cessation over and above behavioural support in people with newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis: an economic evaluation of a multicentre randomised controlled trial

“…It was unclear, however, why participants in the cytisine arm reported more and longer hospital stays than the placebo arm in Pakistan. Our process evaluation study found some difference in intervention delivery between countries,36 37 but we did not find evidence of differential TB treatment outcomes between trial arms in Pakistan,10 and the same situation was not observed in Bangladesh. This might indicate a potential country-related contextual reason rather than the effect of the intervention or occurrence by chance.…”

A complex ePrescribing-based Anti-Microbial Stewardship (ePAMS+) intervention for hospitals combining technological and behavioural components: protocol for a feasibility trial

“…This will involve quantifying each ‘critical decision-making point’ (for example, whether antibiotic review was conducted within 48–72 h of initial prescription) into a 3-point rating scale that reliably discriminates between ‘fully’, ‘partially’ and ‘not implemented’. Although successfully used previously [ 22 – 24 ] these categories might not apply to ePAMS+. The feasibility work will help confirm these categories or explore alternatives such as codifying into ‘present’, ‘absent but should be present’ and ‘not applicable’ [ 25 ].…”

A complex ePrescribing-based Anti-Microbial Stewardship (ePAMS+) intervention for hospitals combining technological and behavioural components: protocol for a feasibility trial

“…This will involve quantifying each 'critical decision-making point' (for example, whether antibiotic review was conducted within 48-72 hours of initial prescription) into a 3point rating scale that reliably discriminates between 'fully', 'partially' and 'not implemented'. Although successfully used previously, [19][20][21] these categories might not apply to ePAMS+. The feasibility work will help confirm these categories or explore alternatives such as codifying into 'present', 'absent but should be present' and 'not applicable'.…”