2021
DOI: 10.1094/phyto-10-20-0468-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Double-Stranded RNAs Targeting Fusarium graminearum TRI6 on Fusarium Head Blight and Mycotoxins

Abstract: Fusarium graminearum is the causal agent of Fusarium head blight (FHB), which reduces crop yield and contaminates grains with poisonous trichothecene mycotoxins, including deoxynivalenol (DON). DON functions as an important virulence factor that promotes FHB spread in wheat; therefore, reducing DON production will decrease yield losses to FHB and enhance food safety. Recent progress using topical application of double-stranded (dsRNA) to reduce F. graminearum infection has provided encouraging results. In this… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The applications of the synthetic dsRNA targeting some important genes in the fungus, including cytochrome P450 lanosterol C-14α-demethylases ( CYP ) (Koch et al 2016 ), Argonaute ( AGO ) RNase protein and DICER (Werner et al 2020 ) and Tri6 (Hao et al 2021 ), may reduce the fungal infection and improve the FHB resistance in wheat and barley. However, direct spraying of dsRNA on plant surfaces can only provide a short protection window (5–20 days) against the pathogens (Mitter et al 2017 ; Worrall et al 2019 ), and the protection cannot be transmitted to the next generation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The applications of the synthetic dsRNA targeting some important genes in the fungus, including cytochrome P450 lanosterol C-14α-demethylases ( CYP ) (Koch et al 2016 ), Argonaute ( AGO ) RNase protein and DICER (Werner et al 2020 ) and Tri6 (Hao et al 2021 ), may reduce the fungal infection and improve the FHB resistance in wheat and barley. However, direct spraying of dsRNA on plant surfaces can only provide a short protection window (5–20 days) against the pathogens (Mitter et al 2017 ; Worrall et al 2019 ), and the protection cannot be transmitted to the next generation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expression of FHB resistance is highly influenced by many environmental factors and plant morphological traits that make it extremely difficult to reproduce phenotypic results (Cuthbert et al 2006 ; Graham and Browne 2009 ; Srinivasachary et al 2009 ; He et al 2016 ). Hao et al ( 2021 ) sprayed Tri6 -dsRNA on wheat and found that the treated plants did not reduce FHB spread under controlled growth chamber conditions, but reduced FHB spread and DON production under greenhouse conditions. Wheat and barley exhibit different FHB resistance mechanisms, barley has natural resistance to reduce the spread of the fungus (type II resistance) whereas wheat combines two primary types of partial FHB resistance including type I (resistance to initial infection) and type II (Mesterházy 1995 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical and biochemical barriers notably limit the entry of topically applied exogenous dsRNA into the plant leaf tissues. These barriers provide possible explanations for the inconsistency of the topical RNAi effect among different plant species, targets, and the environmental settings [ 128 , 143 ]. The interspecific variation in leaf morphologies also indicates the need for host-dependent dsRNA delivery methods, requiring case-by-case evaluation of uptake efficiency upon selection of plant host and pathogen targets for topical RNAi.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%