In contrast, the incidence of dermatological manifestations in adult populations with COVID has been reported to be around 20%, 7 with transient signs and highly variable morphology: morbilliform, pernio-like and urticarial lesions being the most common. 8 Children with COVID-19 who do not have PIMS-TS have been reported to have similar eruptions to adults. 8 The pathological mechanism of MCM in patients with COVID-19 can be classified into those with similar features to other viral exanthems, and those secondary to systemic consequences of COVID-19, particularly vasculopathic and thrombotic tendencies. The predilection of mucocutaneous involvement is poorly understood. In our study, 25Á7% of patients demonstrated MCM after initial presentation of illness, suggesting a reactive phenomenon.The PIMS-TS phenotype is similar to toxic shock syndrome (TSS) and Kawasaki disease (KD); however, there are some significant differences especially with regard to myocardial involvement which is rare in TSS but was commonly encountered especially in the early patients with PIMS-TS. Other differences include the presence of shock in patients with PIMS-TS and TSS, and the relative absence in KD. Coronary abnormalities are relatively common in KD, present in some patients with PIMS-TS with myocardial involvement and variable arrythmias, but rarely encountered in TSS. Gastrointestinal features are often seen in PIMS-TS, relatively frequently seen in TSS but less common in KD. Finally, cutaneous manifestations are seen in all three conditions; however, a fine, diffuse blanching maculopapular rash is typical of TSS, with variable morphology seen in KD and PIMS-TS.To our knowledge this is the largest study to date describing the clinical morphology, time course and sites of MCM in children with PIMS-TS. Importantly, these do not appear to have any prognostic value, and no pathognomonic cutaneous signs were identified. Furthermore, children with PIMS-TS may show MCM more frequently than those with COVID-19 infection. However, due to lack of PCR testing, the true incidence of COVID-19 infection in the early stages of the pandemic are not known.Limitations of our study include retrospective collection of data and reliance on descriptive rash terms by clinicians without specialist training in dermatology. Furthermore, the MCM seen are most likely reactive in nature, disappearing relatively quickly once the patient starts to recover. Future work focusing on the value of using cutaneous signs, such as objective measures of microvascular perfusion as a marker of disease control, would result in less reliance on invasive blood monitoring. There is also need for improved understanding regarding the pathophysiology of MCM in PIMS-TS, in which biopsies from those affected, although seldom performed on children, would be valuable.