2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.03.29.437516
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexually dimorphic placental responses to maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection

Abstract: There is a persistent male bias in the prevalence and severity of COVID-19 disease. Underlying mechanisms accounting for this sex difference remain incompletely understood. Interferon responses have been implicated as a modulator of disease in adults, and play a key role in the placental anti-viral response. Moreover, the interferon response has been shown to alter Fc-receptor expression, and therefore may impact placental antibody transfer. Here we examined the intersection of viral-induced placental interfer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
12
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
2
12
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the setting of third-trimester maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection, relatively low placental transfer ratios were previously reported, possibly relating to an altered antibody glycosylation profile [ 29 ], but we observed higher and satisfactory maternofetal antibody transfer. In addition, although mothers with COVID-19 carrying a male fetus were shown by Bordt et al to exhibit a diminished immune response and compromised neonatal seroprotection [ 30 ], this was not observed in our cohort following maternal vaccination. Furthermore, the lack of detrimental effect of maternal anthropometric parameters and the prenatal administration of anti-D immunoglobulin, on the level of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies conveyed to the offspring are reassuring findings.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…In the setting of third-trimester maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection, relatively low placental transfer ratios were previously reported, possibly relating to an altered antibody glycosylation profile [ 29 ], but we observed higher and satisfactory maternofetal antibody transfer. In addition, although mothers with COVID-19 carrying a male fetus were shown by Bordt et al to exhibit a diminished immune response and compromised neonatal seroprotection [ 30 ], this was not observed in our cohort following maternal vaccination. Furthermore, the lack of detrimental effect of maternal anthropometric parameters and the prenatal administration of anti-D immunoglobulin, on the level of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies conveyed to the offspring are reassuring findings.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…While in the setting of third-trimester maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection relatively low placental transfer ratios were previously reported, possibly relating to an altered antibody glycosylation profile [29], we observed higher and satisfactory maternofetal antibody transfer. In addition, although mothers with COVID-19 carrying a male fetus were shown by Bordt et al to exhibit a diminished immune response and compromised neonatal seroprotection [30], this was not observed in our cohort following maternal vaccination. Furthermore, the lack of detrimental effect of maternal anthropometric parameters and the prenatal administration of anti-D immunoglobulin, on the level of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies conveyed to the offspring are other reassuring findings.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Reduced placental transfer of SARS-CoV-2-specific immunoglobulin has been observed previously 26 , possibly due to altered glycosylation 27 . Furthermore, reduced maternal SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody titers and impaired placental antibody transfer were also noted in pregnancies with a male fetus 28 , although there did not appear to be any sex bias in our dataset. It is currently unclear whether antibodies induced via vaccination, as opposed to natural infection, differ in terms of their glycosylation status and subsequent placental transfer, which is an important area of research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%